Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill would ban oil and gas work in Spanish Mediterranean

Amendments step 3 of 7 · Unfinished

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 3 December 2019. Introduced by: Comunidad Autónoma de las Illes Balears-Parlamento.

Official title: Private member's bill on the protection of the Mediterranean Sea under Spanish jurisdiction from damage that may be caused by the exploration, research, and exploitation of hydrocarbons and other mineral substances (corresponding to file numbers 125/000025/0000 of the XII Legislature and 125/000012/0000 of the XIII Legislature).

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 125/000007· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would ban exploring, researching and extracting hydrocarbons or other mineral substances in the Mediterranean under Spanish jurisdiction. It would also ban seismic exploration, unless the technology used is scientifically proven to be completely harmless.
  2. Exploration permits already granted before the law takes effect would remain valid until they expire. They could not be extended in any case.
  3. The law would also apply to pending applications for exploration, research, extraction or seismic surveys that have not been decided when it takes effect.
  4. The law would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette (Boletín Oficial del Estado).

Who it affects

  • Energy and mining companies: They could no longer explore for or extract hydrocarbons or other minerals in the Spanish Mediterranean.
  • Holders of already granted exploration permits: They could finish their activities, but with no possibility of extension.
  • Applicants with pending requests: Their undecided applications would be subject to the new ban.

Words worth knowing

Adquisición sísmica (seismic survey)
An exploration technique that uses sound waves to look for deposits under the seabed.
Proposición de ley (bill)
A text that a regional parliament or other body proposes as a law to the Congress. It is not a law until passed.
Hidrocarburos (hydrocarbons)
Substances such as oil or natural gas, made of carbon and hydrogen.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 3 of 7 steps. It reached Amendments, and today it is unfinished.

  1. Introduced3 December 2019Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted13 December 2019The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments18 March 2021Groups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 8 official steps on a timeline
Dec 2019Dec 2020Dec 2021Dec 202211. 3 December 2019: Presentación22. 13 December 2019: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 13/12/2019 hasta 20/12/201933. 13 December 2019: Calificación44. 20 December 2019: Gobierno Contestación desde 20/12/2019 hasta 29/02/202055. 29 February 2020: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 29/02/2020 hasta 09/03/202166. 9 March 2021: Mesa del Congreso Acuerdo subsiguiente a la toma en consideración desde 09/03/2021 hasta 16/03/202177. 18 March 2021: Comisión de Transición Ecológica y Reto Demográfico Enmiendas desde 18/03/2021 hasta 30/05/202388. 30 May 2023: Concluido - (Caducado) desde 30/05/2023 hasta 16/06/2023

9 March 2021

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 284 yes · 0 no · 50 abst.

Voted on: Private member's bill from the Parliament of the Balearic Islands, on the protection of the Mediterranean Sea under Spanish jurisdiction from damage that may be caused by the exploration, research and exploitation of hydrocarbons and other mineral substances (corresponding to file numbers 125/00025/0000 of the XII Legislature and 125/000012/0000 of the XIII Legislature).

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 80· updated 11 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Ciudadanos, Gcup-ec-gc, GPlu, Sin grupo and Popular en el Congreso.

By province: in 51 most voted in favour; in 0, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 51
  • Against: 0
  • Abstained: 1
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu5
5 did not vote
Republicano13
13 in favour
Socialista120
120 in favour
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)6
5 in favour · 1 did not vote
Mixto9
9 in favour
Ciudadanos10
10 in favour
Gcup-ec-gc35
35 in favour
GPlu11
9 in favour · 2 did not vote
Sin grupo1
1 in favour
Popular en el Congreso88
82 in favour · 6 did not vote
VOX52
50 abst. · 2 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.

It has not been presented again yet.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.