Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.
Sign in

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill would require family impact analysis for new laws

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Unfinished

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 23 November 2022. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario VOX.

Official title: Private member's bill amending Law 50/1997, of 27 November, on the Government, to incorporate the family perspective in the drafting of laws.

Follow this law

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000276· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would require every regulatory impact analysis report to include a section on how the rule would affect families, especially in education, transport, taxation, housing and energy.
  2. It would also remove the gender impact analysis and replace the climate change one with an assessment of climate and the natural environment based on rationality and scientific evidence.
  3. Within six months, the Government would have to report to the Cortes on which rules would need to be repealed or amended for requiring gender or climate change impact analysis.
  4. The law would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette.

Who it affects

  • The Government, which prepares the impact analysis reports.: It would have to add the family impact analysis and change the gender and climate change ones.
  • Families, as the target of the new analysis.: Rules would be assessed for their effect on the family sphere.
  • The Cortes Generales (Spanish Parliament).: They would receive a report on rules that would need to be repealed or amended.

Words worth knowing

Memoria del Análisis de Impacto Normativo (MAIN)
A report accompanying each Government draft rule that analyzes its cost and effects before it is passed.
Anteproyecto de ley
A draft bill prepared by the Government before sending it to Congress.
Trámite de consulta pública
A period during which anyone can give their opinion on a draft rule.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is unfinished.

  1. Introduced23 November 2022Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted29 November 2022The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
Dec 2022Mar 202311. 23 November 2022: Presentación22. 29 November 2022: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 29/11/2022 hasta 02/12/202233. 29 November 2022: Calificación44. 2 December 2022: Gobierno Contestación desde 02/12/2022 hasta 13/02/202355. 13 February 2023: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 13/02/2023 hasta 30/05/202366. 30 May 2023: Concluido - (Caducado) desde 30/05/2023 hasta 16/06/2023

Was there a plenary vote?

We have no plenary vote linked to this law in the Congreso’s data.

What happens next

What happens now?

The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.

It was presented again:

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.

Read the full method · Report an error