What it is
Bill would bar fugitives from Spanish justice from running for office
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 2 November 2022. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario VOX.
Official title: Private member's bill for an Organic Law amending Organic Law 5/1985, of June 19, on the General Electoral Regime, to include fugitives from justice as ineligible.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000266· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would add a new ground for ineligibility: people with an active arrest and surrender order issued by a Spanish judge for their responsibility in crimes against the Constitution or sedition could not run in elections.
- It would also amend section b) of Article 6 so that it covers crimes against the Constitution and sedition, in addition to the offenses already listed.
- The statement of reasons justifies the measure by recent cases of people with Spanish court orders who appeared on electoral lists, and argues the restriction would be temporary and would only affect the exercise of the right, not its ownership.
- The Government would be empowered to issue whatever rules are needed, and the law would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette.
Who it affects
- People with an active arrest and surrender order issued by a Spanish judge for crimes against the Constitution or sedition: They could not run as candidates while the order is in force.
- Political parties: They could not include people in that situation on their electoral lists.
- Spanish judges and courts: They would have a new tool to enforce compliance with their rulings.
Words worth knowing
- Inelegible
- A person the law bars from running as a candidate in an election.
- Sufragio pasivo
- The right to run as a candidate and hold public office.
- Orden de detención y entrega
- A court order to arrest someone and bring them before the judge, for example when they have failed to appear in court.
- Sedición
- The crime of rising up violently or in a riotous way to prevent authorities from carrying out their duties.
- Proposición de ley orgánica
- A bill filed by a parliamentary group to amend a special law; in this case it has not been passed yet.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced2 November 2022Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted14 November 2022The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
14 February 2023
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill by the VOX Parliamentary Group, Organic bill amending Organic Law 5/1985, of June 19, on the General Electoral Regime, to include fugitives from justice as ineligible candidates.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 234· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Albacete Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 7 yes · 5 no
- Almería More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Araba/Álava More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Asturias More votes against 2 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Barcelona More votes against 6 yes · 25 no
- Bizkaia More votes against 1 yes · 7 no
- Burgos Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 5 yes · 4 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Girona More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Granada More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Huelva More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Jaén More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- León Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Lleida More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Lugo Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 19 yes · 15 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 6 yes · 5 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 6 yes · 4 no
- Navarra More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Ourense Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes against 5 yes · 7 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Teruel Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 8 yes · 7 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Ciudadanos, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Gcup-ec-gc and GPlu. 4 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 19 most voted in favour; in 20, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 19
- Against: 20
- Tie: 13
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 5 | 5 against |
| Republicano | 13 | 12 against · 1 did not vote |
| Socialista | 119 | 118 against · 1 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 6 | 6 against |
| Mixto | 11 | 2 in favour · 5 against · 2 abst. · 2 did not vote |
| Ciudadanos | 9 | 9 in favour |
| Gcup-ec-gc | 33 | 31 against · 2 did not vote |
| GPlu | 12 | 11 against · 1 did not vote |
| Sin grupo | 1 | 1 did not vote |
| Popular en el Congreso | 88 | 86 in favour · 2 did not vote |
| VOX | 52 | 52 in favour |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
It was presented again:
- XV Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Unfinished Bill would bar fugitives from justice from running in elections
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000266
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 234
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.