What it is
Bill to improve farm unemployment benefits in Andalusia and Extremadura
Amendments step 3 of 7 · UnfinishedIt is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 17 June 2022. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Confederal de Unidas Podemos-En Comú Podem-Galicia en Común.
Official title: Private member's bill to improve the working conditions and social protection of agricultural workers employed by others and of temporary agricultural workers in Andalusia and Extremadura.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000236· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would merge the current farm subsidy and the farm income scheme into a new agricultural unemployment subsidy for seasonal farm workers in Andalusia and Extremadura. First-time applicants would only need 30 days of contributions in the previous 24 months, instead of the current system of counted work days.
- The new subsidy would be tied to the minimum wage: it would start at 50% of the minimum wage and rise with contributed work days, reaching 75% with 170 or more days per year.
- The Social Security registration system would change: employers would have to register workers before the workday starts, removing the current rule that allows registration until noon on that day.
- The bill would define who counts as a farm employer for Social Security purposes and would exclude from the special farm system workers supplied by temporary work agencies or service companies, to fight undeclared work.
- Farm cooperatives could organize crews of farm workers and assign them to their members during harvest seasons.
- The means-tested unemployment benefit for people over 52 would be extended to farm wage earners, and the Government would have to develop the new subsidy in a Royal Decree within three months.
Who it affects
- Seasonal farm workers in Andalusia and Extremadura: They would get a new unemployment subsidy with simpler day-count requirements and amounts tied to the minimum wage.
- Farm companies and landowners: They would have to register workers before the workday starts and face more labor inspection.
- Temporary work agencies and farm service companies: Their workers would be outside the special farm system.
- Farm cooperatives: They could organize worker crews and assign them to their members.
- Farm workers over 52: They would gain access to the means-tested unemployment benefit for that age group.
Words worth knowing
- Peonadas
- Counted days of farm work that are contributed to Social Security and currently required to get the subsidy.
- SETACA
- Special System for Salaried Agricultural Workers: the Social Security scheme where farm wage workers pay contributions.
- SMI
- Salario mínimo interprofesional: Spain's statutory minimum wage.
- IPREM
- A public income indicator used in Spain to calculate some benefits.
- Economía sumergida
- Undeclared work: jobs done off the books, without Social Security contributions.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 3 of 7 steps. It reached Amendments, and today it is unfinished.
- Introduced17 June 2022Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted21 June 2022The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments3 May 2023Groups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 9 official steps on a timeline
25 April 2023
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private Member's Bill of the Confederal Parliamentary Group of Unidas Podemos-En Comú Podem-Galicia en Común, on improving the working conditions and social protection of self-employed agricultural workers and temporary agricultural workers in Andalusia and Extremadura.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 254· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Albacete More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no · 7 abst.
- Almería More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 4 abst.
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Asturias More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Ávila More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Badajoz More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Barcelona More votes in favour 21 yes · 0 no · 10 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 4 abst.
- Burgos More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Cáceres More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Cádiz More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 5 abst.
- Cantabria More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Ceuta Tie 0 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Córdoba More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Cuenca More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Girona More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Granada More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Huelva More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Huesca More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 4 abst.
- Jaén More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- La Rioja More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- León More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Lleida More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Lugo More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Madrid More votes in favour 15 yes · 1 no · 18 abst.
- Málaga More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no · 6 abst.
- Melilla Tie 0 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Murcia More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 6 abst.
- Navarra More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Ourense More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Palencia More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Salamanca More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 4 abst.
- Segovia More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Sevilla More votes in favour 6 yes · 1 no · 4 abst.
- Soria More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Tarragona More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Teruel More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Toledo More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 4 abst.
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no · 8 abst.
- Valladolid More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Zamora More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Mixto and Gcup-ec-gc. 10 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 19 most voted in favour; in 0, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 19
- Against: 0
- Abstained: 20
- Tie: 13
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Republicano | 13 | 12 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Socialista | 120 | 117 in favour · 1 abst. · 2 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 6 | 6 abst. |
| Mixto | 11 | 6 in favour · 1 against · 3 abst. · 1 did not vote |
| Ciudadanos | 9 | 1 against · 8 abst. |
| Gcup-ec-gc | 33 | 30 in favour · 3 did not vote |
| GPlu | 12 | 4 in favour · 8 abst. |
| Popular en el Congreso | 88 | 86 abst. · 2 did not vote |
| VOX | 52 | 51 abst. · 1 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.
It has not been presented again yet.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000236
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 254
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.