What it is
Proposal to regulate growing, selling and using cannabis
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 19 May 2022. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Republicano.
Official title: Private member's bill for the comprehensive regulation of cannabis.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000228· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would allow growing cannabis at home for personal use, with a maximum of six psychoactive plants and a harvest of 480 grams per year per person. Non-psychoactive cannabis (under 0.2% THC Tetrahidrocannabinol, the substance in cannabis that produces psychoactive effects (the 'high').) would have no limits.
- Therapeutic cannabis would be dispensed at pharmacies with a doctor's prescription and funded by the National Health System. Psychoactive cannabis would require a prescription; non-psychoactive cannabis would not.
- Recreational use would be limited to adults, and cannabis associations and clubs could allow their members to consume on their premises. Public consumption would follow the same bans as tobacco.
- Selling cannabis would require a license and would be limited to authorized parties: growshops (seeds and seedlings only), farming companies, drug manufacturers, and makers of industrial hemp products.
- The bill sets a penalty system with fines from €30 to €600,000 depending on whether the offense is minor, serious or very serious. Advertising, promotion and sponsorship of cannabis would be a very serious offense, except for the exceptions provided.
- The Government would have three months to recognize cannabis as a medicine and six months to introduce a bill creating a special tax on cannabis, similar to the one on tobacco. The law would take effect three months after publication, except for part of its titles.
Who it affects
- Cannabis consumers: Could grow at home within limits, buy at pharmacies with a prescription for therapeutic use, and consume legally as adults.
- Cannabis associations and clubs: Would get a legal framework for communal growing and could supply cannabis to their members.
- Cannabis businesses and professionals: Would need licenses to grow, transport, sell or research cannabis.
- Pharmacies and health professionals: Would dispense therapeutic cannabis by prescription under medical supervision.
- Public administrations: The Government, Autonomous Communities and Local Entities would share licensing, control, inspection and penalty powers.
Words worth knowing
- THC
- Tetrahidrocannabinol, the substance in cannabis that produces psychoactive effects (the 'high').
- Declaración responsable (responsible declaration)
- A document in which someone declares, under their own responsibility, that they meet the legal requirements, without waiting for a license.
- Growshop
- A store selling seeds, seedlings and growing supplies.
- Cáñamo industrial (industrial hemp)
- A cannabis variety with very little THC, grown for fiber and seeds for industrial uses.
- Proposición de ley (bill)
- A draft law introduced by parliamentary groups. It is not a law until approved by the Congress and the Senate.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced19 May 2022Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted24 May 2022The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
21 February 2023
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill by the Republican Parliamentary Group, for the comprehensive regulation of cannabis.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 237· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 1 yes · 6 no
- Albacete More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 2 yes · 10 no
- Almería More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Asturias More votes against 1 yes · 6 no
- Ávila More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Badajoz More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 20 yes · 12 no
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 5 yes · 3 no
- Burgos More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Cáceres More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Cádiz More votes against 2 yes · 7 no
- Cantabria More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 0 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- Córdoba More votes against 1 yes · 5 no
- Cuenca More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Girona More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Granada More votes against 1 yes · 6 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Huelva More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Huesca More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 2 yes · 6 no
- Jaén More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- La Rioja More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 1 yes · 6 no
- León More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Lugo More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Madrid More votes against 8 yes · 25 no
- Málaga More votes against 2 yes · 9 no
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 1 yes · 9 no
- Navarra More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ourense More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Palencia More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Salamanca More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 1 yes · 5 no
- Segovia More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Sevilla More votes against 2 yes · 9 no
- Soria More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Teruel More votes against 0 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Toledo More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 4 yes · 11 no
- Valladolid More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Zamora More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 1 yes · 6 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Ciudadanos, Gcup-ec-gc and GPlu. Against, most of Socialista, Mixto, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. 6 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 7 most voted in favour; in 45, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 7
- Against: 45
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Republicano | 13 | 13 in favour |
| Socialista | 120 | 118 against · 2 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 6 | 6 in favour |
| Mixto | 11 | 4 in favour · 5 against · 1 abst. · 1 did not vote |
| Ciudadanos | 9 | 8 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Gcup-ec-gc | 33 | 30 in favour · 3 did not vote |
| GPlu | 12 | 12 in favour |
| Popular en el Congreso | 88 | 86 against · 1 abst. · 1 did not vote |
| VOX | 52 | 52 against |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000228
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 237
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.