Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill to tighten environmental rules for mining in Spain

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Rejected

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 20 April 2022. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Confederal de Unidas Podemos-En Comú Podem-Galicia en Común.

Official title: Private member's bill to amend Law 22/1973, of July 21, on Mines.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000216· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would make all natural deposits and geological resources public domain assets that must be protected, and would move mineral and thermal waters out of the Mining Law into water legislation.
  2. It would add public participation: permits and concessions would go through public information of at least 30 business days, with participation activities for affected people, and a provincial advisory body would be created.
  3. Permits would only be effective once all other required authorizations are obtained, and could only be granted together with restoration, dismantling and closure plans and complementary projects. Natura 2000 sites and other protected areas would be excluded from mining registration.
  4. Only companies that prove legal, technical and financial capacity could hold mining rights, with joint liability for entities that complete that capacity, and transfers could not reduce guarantees or conditions.
  5. It would create a 10% levy on the value of extracted materials, earmarked for protecting geological diversity, and raise fines: up to €10 million for very serious offenses.
  6. It would ban authorizing mining on or under the seabed under Spanish jurisdiction until technology and science can guarantee no damage to marine ecosystems, and would repeal the 1977 Mining Promotion Law.

Who it affects

  • Mining companies: More procedures, required financial and technical guarantees, a 10% levy, and fines up to €10 million.
  • Citizens and residents near mining areas: They could take part in procedures and receive information about projects.
  • Environmental and water authorities: Their reports would be required beforehand and, in some cases, binding before permits are granted.
  • Affected local councils: They would have to issue prior reports on mining projects.

Words worth knowing

Dominio público (public domain)
Assets that belong to everyone and are managed by the State; they cannot be privately owned.
Permiso de investigación (exploration permit)
Authorization to carry out studies and work to find mineral resources on a plot of land.
Concesión de explotación (exploitation concession)
Authorization to extract and use mineral resources for a period of time.
Red Natura 2000 (Natura 2000 network)
European Union network of protected natural areas.
Informe vinculante (binding report)
A report the administration must follow; it cannot decide against it.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced20 April 2022Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted26 April 2022The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
Apr 2022May 202211. 20 April 2022: Presentación22. 26 April 2022: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 26/04/2022 hasta 29/04/202233. 26 April 2022: Calificación44. 29 April 2022: Gobierno Contestación desde 29/04/2022 hasta 07/06/202255. 7 June 2022: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 07/06/2022 hasta 23/06/202266. 23 June 2022: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 23/06/2022 hasta 29/06/2022

23 June 2022

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 36 yes · 283 no · 22 abst.

Voted on: Private member's bill of the Confederal Parliamentary Group of Unidas Podemos-En Comú Podem-Galicia en Común, amending Law 22/1973, of July 21, on Mines.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 96 of sitting 189· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Gcup-ec-gc. Against, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Ciudadanos, GPlu, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. 10 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 0 most voted in favour; in 51, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 0
  • Against: 51
  • Tie: 1
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu5
5 abst.
Republicano13
13 abst.
Socialista120
120 against
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)6
6 against
Mixto11
1 in favour · 5 against · 4 abst. · 1 did not vote
Ciudadanos9
8 against · 1 did not vote
Gcup-ec-gc33
31 in favour · 1 against · 1 did not vote
GPlu12
4 in favour · 8 against
Popular en el Congreso88
86 against · 2 did not vote
VOX52
49 against · 3 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.