Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill to shield RTVE's independence and give EFE its own law

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Rejected

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 14 January 2022. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Ciudadanos.

Official title: Private member's bill on radio, television and the state-owned public news service.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000196· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would change how RTVE's board members are chosen: an Experts Committee would shortlist candidates on merit, and the Cortes Generales (Spanish Parliament) would pick from that list, with five men and five women. If no one gets the required majority, the highest scored candidates would be appointed.
  2. It would expand ineligibility rules: anyone who in the previous five years held an elected or political office, or a directive role in unions or political parties, could not be a board member.
  3. The EFE news agency would get its own law for the first time, with a six member board (four elected by the Congress of Deputies and two by the Senate) using the same selection system as RTVE.
  4. The Congress of Deputies would elect RTVE's chair from among the elected board members, by a three fifths majority. If no candidate wins, the one with the highest merit score would be appointed.
  5. Board members would serve six year, non renewable terms. The bill sets individual and collective removal grounds, such as budget deviations or failing public service performance indicators.
  6. The bill would repeal the current RTVE Law 17/2006 and would take effect the day after its publication in the official gazette, except for provisions affecting the budget.

Words worth knowing

Comisión Mixta
A committee of deputies and senators that oversees, on behalf of Parliament, compliance with the public service mission.
Mayoría de tres quintos
A supermajority: at least 3 out of 5 members of a chamber must vote in favor.
Sociedad mercantil estatal
A state owned company that operates under private company rules.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced14 January 2022Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted25 January 2022The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
Mar 2022Jun 2022Sept 202211. 14 January 2022: Presentación22. 25 January 2022: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 25/01/2022 hasta 28/01/202233. 25 January 2022: Calificación44. 28 January 2022: Gobierno Contestación desde 28/01/2022 hasta 08/03/202255. 8 March 2022: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 08/03/2022 hasta 04/10/202266. 4 October 2022: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 04/10/2022 hasta 10/10/2022

4 October 2022

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 67 yes · 173 no · 101 abst.

Voted on: Private member's bill by the Ciudadanos Parliamentary Group, on radio, television and the state-owned public news service.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 206· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Mixto, Ciudadanos and VOX. Against, most of Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV) and Gcup-ec-gc. 8 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 1 most voted in favour; in 30, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 1
  • Against: 30
  • Abstained: 4
  • Tie: 17
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu5
5 abst.
Republicano13
12 against · 1 did not vote
Socialista120
118 against · 2 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)6
6 against
Mixto11
4 in favour · 3 against · 1 abst. · 3 did not vote
Ciudadanos9
9 in favour
Gcup-ec-gc33
33 against
GPlu12
3 in favour · 1 against · 7 abst. · 1 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso88
88 abst.
VOX52
51 in favour · 1 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

The same initiative in the other chamber:

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.