What it is
Bill proposes 26 weeks of leave for single-parent families
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 1 January 2022. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso.
Official title: Private member's bill amending Real Decreto Legislativo 2/2015, of 23 October, approving the consolidated text of the Workers' Statute, and Real Decreto Legislativo 5/2015, approving the consolidated text of the Basic Statute of the Public Employee, regarding the regulation of maternity and paternity leave, allowing its extension to 26 weeks in the case of single-parent families.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000192· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill starts from the fact that children in single-parent families get care from only one parent for 16 weeks, while children with two parents get 26 weeks combined. The bill sees this as an unfair disadvantage that the law should fix.
- The bill would add a section to the Workers' Statute so that birth or adoption leave lasts 26 weeks when there is only one parent, under the same conditions as when there are two.
- The same change is proposed for the Basic Statute of Public Employees, so public workers in single-parent families would also get the 26 weeks.
- The General Social Security Law would be updated so the benefit for birth and childcare also covers this extended leave. The law would take effect the day after publication in the official state gazette, except measures with budget costs, which would wait until the following fiscal year.
Who it affects
- Single parents with biological or adopted children: They would be entitled to 26 weeks of leave instead of 16, if the bill is passed.
- Public employees in single-parent families: The extended leave would also apply to public sector workers.
- Children in single-parent families: They could be cared for by their only parent for the same time as children with two parents.
Words worth knowing
- Familia monoparental
- A household where a single father or mother lives with one or more children.
- Texto refundido
- A single, consolidated version of a law that gathers all its previous amendments.
- Proposición de ley
- A bill introduced by members of the Spanish Parliament; it is not yet an approved law.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 3 of 7 steps. It reached Amendments, and today it is unfinished.
- Introduced1 January 2022Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted11 January 2022The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments5 April 2022Groups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 9 official steps on a timeline
24 March 2022
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill from the Popular in the Congress Parliamentary Group, amending Royal Legislative Decree 2/2015, of 23 October, approving the consolidated text of the Workers' Statute, and Royal Legislative Decree 5/2015, approving the consolidated text of the Basic Statute of the Public Employee, regarding the regulation of maternity and paternity leave, allowing its extension to 26 weeks in the case of single-parent families.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 165· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- Albacete More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 12 yes · 0 no
- Almería More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Badajoz More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 30 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- Burgos More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Cáceres More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 9 yes · 0 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Córdoba More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Cuenca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Girona More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Granada More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- Jaén More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- La Rioja More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- León More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Lugo More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 33 yes · 0 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 11 yes · 0 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 10 yes · 0 no
- Navarra More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Ourense More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 11 yes · 0 no
- Soria More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Teruel More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 14 yes · 0 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Ciudadanos, Gcup-ec-gc, GPlu, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 52 most voted in favour; in 0, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 52
- Against: 0
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Republicano | 13 | 12 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Socialista | 120 | 118 in favour · 2 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 6 | 6 in favour |
| Mixto | 11 | 8 in favour · 2 abst. · 1 did not vote |
| Ciudadanos | 9 | 9 in favour |
| Gcup-ec-gc | 33 | 32 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| GPlu | 12 | 12 in favour |
| Popular en el Congreso | 88 | 84 in favour · 4 did not vote |
| VOX | 52 | 51 in favour · 1 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.
It has not been presented again yet.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000192
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 165
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.