Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill would presume self-defense when protecting your home

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Rejected

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 1 October 2021. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario VOX.

Official title: Private member's organic bill for the amendment of Organic Law 10/1995, of 23 November, of the Penal Code

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000167· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would change the rules on self-defense in the Criminal Code. Its authors say people who defend their homes face long criminal proceedings over alleged excesses in the means of defense used.
  2. A new section would be added to Article 20 of the Criminal Code. It would presume that the means used was rationally necessary when someone defends their home, its outbuildings, or, if there is a risk of attack, a commercial, professional or business premises, regardless of the result caused.
  3. The presumption would only apply if the means of defense requires an administrative permit and the defender had one. The requirement that the defender did not sufficiently provoke the attack would also remain.
  4. If passed, the law would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette (Boletín Oficial del Estado).

Who it affects

  • People who defend their home or its outbuildings against an unlawful entry.: The means of defense used would be presumed rational, without a judge having to assess it.
  • Owners of commercial, professional or business premises.: The rationality of the means used would also be presumed if there is a risk of attack at the premises.
  • People using means of defense that require an administrative permit.: They would only benefit from the presumption if they held that permit.

Words worth knowing

Legítima defensa (self-defense)
A legal ground that removes criminal liability for someone who acts to repel an unlawful attack, if certain requirements are met.
Morada (dwelling)
The home where a person lives, not just any property they own.
Presumir ex lege (presumed by law)
Something is taken as true by law, without the judge needing to analyze it.
Proposición de Ley Orgánica (Organic Law bill)
A text submitted to the Congress of Deputies to change a law, not yet approved.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced1 October 2021Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted5 October 2021The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
Dec 2021Mar 2022Jun 202211. 1 October 2021: Presentación22. 5 October 2021: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 05/10/2021 hasta 08/10/202133. 5 October 2021: Calificación44. 8 October 2021: Gobierno Contestación desde 08/10/2021 hasta 17/11/202155. 17 November 2021: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 17/11/2021 hasta 20/09/202266. 20 September 2022: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 20/09/2022 hasta 26/09/2022

20 September 2022

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 53 yes · 289 no

Voted on: Private member's bill of the VOX Parliamentary Group, Organic, for the amendment of Organic Law 10/1995, of 23 November, of the Penal Code.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 200· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Ciudadanos, Gcup-ec-gc, GPlu and Popular en el Congreso. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.

By province: in 1 most voted in favour; in 51, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 1
  • Against: 51
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu5
5 against
Republicano13
11 against · 2 did not vote
Socialista120
120 against
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)6
6 against
Mixto11
1 in favour · 10 against
Ciudadanos9
9 against
Gcup-ec-gc33
29 against · 4 did not vote
GPlu12
12 against
Popular en el Congreso88
87 against · 1 did not vote
VOX52
52 in favour

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.