What it is
Bill would presume self-defense when protecting your home
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 1 October 2021. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario VOX.
Official title: Private member's organic bill for the amendment of Organic Law 10/1995, of 23 November, of the Penal Code
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000167· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would change the rules on self-defense in the Criminal Code. Its authors say people who defend their homes face long criminal proceedings over alleged excesses in the means of defense used.
- A new section would be added to Article 20 of the Criminal Code. It would presume that the means used was rationally necessary when someone defends their home, its outbuildings, or, if there is a risk of attack, a commercial, professional or business premises, regardless of the result caused.
- The presumption would only apply if the means of defense requires an administrative permit and the defender had one. The requirement that the defender did not sufficiently provoke the attack would also remain.
- If passed, the law would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette (Boletín Oficial del Estado).
Who it affects
- People who defend their home or its outbuildings against an unlawful entry.: The means of defense used would be presumed rational, without a judge having to assess it.
- Owners of commercial, professional or business premises.: The rationality of the means used would also be presumed if there is a risk of attack at the premises.
- People using means of defense that require an administrative permit.: They would only benefit from the presumption if they held that permit.
Words worth knowing
- Legítima defensa (self-defense)
- A legal ground that removes criminal liability for someone who acts to repel an unlawful attack, if certain requirements are met.
- Morada (dwelling)
- The home where a person lives, not just any property they own.
- Presumir ex lege (presumed by law)
- Something is taken as true by law, without the judge needing to analyze it.
- Proposición de Ley Orgánica (Organic Law bill)
- A text submitted to the Congress of Deputies to change a law, not yet approved.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced1 October 2021Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted5 October 2021The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
20 September 2022
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill of the VOX Parliamentary Group, Organic, for the amendment of Organic Law 10/1995, of 23 November, of the Penal Code.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 200· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 0 yes · 7 no
- Albacete More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 3 yes · 9 no
- Almería More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Araba/Álava More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Asturias More votes against 1 yes · 6 no
- Ávila More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Badajoz More votes against 1 yes · 5 no
- Barcelona More votes against 2 yes · 28 no
- Bizkaia More votes against 0 yes · 8 no
- Burgos More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Cáceres More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Cádiz More votes against 2 yes · 7 no
- Cantabria More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Córdoba More votes against 1 yes · 5 no
- Cuenca More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Girona More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Granada More votes against 1 yes · 6 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Huelva More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Huesca More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 2 yes · 6 no
- Jaén More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- La Rioja More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 1 yes · 7 no
- León More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Lleida More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Lugo More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Madrid More votes against 7 yes · 30 no
- Málaga More votes against 2 yes · 9 no
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 3 yes · 7 no
- Navarra More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Ourense More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Palencia More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Salamanca More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 1 yes · 5 no
- Segovia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Sevilla More votes against 3 yes · 9 no
- Soria More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Tarragona More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Teruel More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Toledo More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 3 yes · 12 no
- Valladolid More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Zamora More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 1 yes · 6 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Ciudadanos, Gcup-ec-gc, GPlu and Popular en el Congreso. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.
By province: in 1 most voted in favour; in 51, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 1
- Against: 51
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 5 | 5 against |
| Republicano | 13 | 11 against · 2 did not vote |
| Socialista | 120 | 120 against |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 6 | 6 against |
| Mixto | 11 | 1 in favour · 10 against |
| Ciudadanos | 9 | 9 against |
| Gcup-ec-gc | 33 | 29 against · 4 did not vote |
| GPlu | 12 | 12 against |
| Popular en el Congreso | 88 | 87 against · 1 did not vote |
| VOX | 52 | 52 in favour |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000167
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 200
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.