Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Proposal to legalize and regulate cannabis in Spain

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Rejected

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 27 September 2021. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Plural.

Official title: Private member's bill on a comprehensive cannabis law

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000164· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill declares cannabis cultivation, self-cultivation and its uses free, within the limits and rules it sets.
  2. For personal use it sets limits presumed legal: 12 plants outdoors, 1,200 watts indoors, 3,650 grams of dried flower and 1,000 grams of derivatives. Anyone exceeding them must register their crop as personal use.
  3. Professional uses would require prior authorization and registration, with a unique code tracking the plant and its derivatives to the end user. Indoor crops would need at least 60% renewable energy.
  4. Medical use would require a doctor's prescription and prior registration, and would be subject to drug legislation. In addition, patenting discoveries related to the plant and its derivatives would be banned.
  5. It creates a Special Tax on Cannabis, with a maximum rate of 35% on the final retail price. 60% of the revenue would go to public health.
  6. Driving could not be punished merely for the presence of THC The psychoactive substance in cannabis, the one that alters mood. in the body, but driving under its influence could. Consumption during leisure time could not be punished at work. Rules on personal use would take effect the day after publication, the rest on January 1 of the following year.

Who it affects

  • People who consume or grow cannabis for their own use: They could do so legally within the set limits, with limited transport in public.
  • Farmers and cannabis businesses: They would need authorization, registration and traceability to grow or sell professionally.
  • Medical cannabis patients: They could access cannabis treatments with a doctor's prescription.
  • Shops and distributors: They would have to meet security, labeling and advertising restriction requirements.
  • Minors and legally incapacitated people: The bill would not cover their recreational use.

Words worth knowing

THC
The psychoactive substance in cannabis, the one that alters mood.
CBD
Another cannabis substance with no psychoactive effects, used in products such as oils.
Trazabilidad (traceability)
Being able to track a product from its origin to the final consumer.
Impuesto especial (special tax)
A tax on specific products, like tobacco or alcohol.
Silencio positivo (positive silence)
If the administration does not reply within the deadline, the request is deemed approved.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced27 September 2021Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted5 October 2021The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
Oct 2021Oct 2021Oct 2021Oct 202111. 27 September 2021: Presentación22. 5 October 2021: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 05/10/2021 hasta 08/10/202133. 5 October 2021: Calificación44. 8 October 2021: Gobierno Contestación desde 08/10/2021 hasta 13/10/202155. 13 October 2021: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 13/10/2021 hasta 19/10/202166. 19 October 2021: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 19/10/2021 hasta 25/10/2021

19 October 2021

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 75 yes · 263 no · 9 abst.

Voted on: Private member's bill by the Plural Parliamentary Group, on the integral regulation of cannabis.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 125· updated 11 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Ciudadanos, Gcup-ec-gc and GPlu. Against, most of Socialista, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 6 most voted in favour; in 45, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 6
  • Against: 45
  • Tie: 1
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu5
5 in favour
Republicano13
13 in favour
Socialista120
120 against
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)6
6 abst.
Mixto10
4 in favour · 4 against · 1 abst. · 1 did not vote
Ciudadanos9
9 in favour
Gcup-ec-gc35
34 in favour · 1 did not vote
GPlu12
10 in favour · 2 abst.
Popular en el Congreso88
87 against · 1 did not vote
VOX52
52 against

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.