What it is
Bill to guarantee mental health rights and public care
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 10 September 2021. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Confederal de Unidas Podemos-En Comú Podem-Galicia en Común.
Official title: Private member's bill on the General Mental Health Act
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000158· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would guarantee universal access to mental health services through the National Health System, with no discrimination based on any personal or social condition, and special attention to vulnerable groups.
- It would recognize rights such as comprehensive care, autonomy, informed consent, shared decisions, advance decisions and the appointment of a reference person, plus protection against risky treatments and harm caused by medical care itself.
- It would set specific rights for children and teenagers, for women with mental health problems and for people with disabilities or at risk of exclusion, including a ban on preventive medicalization of minors and on forced sterilization of women.
- The bill would set maximum waiting time guarantees and minimum staffing ratios, with at least 18 psychiatrists, 18 clinical psychologists and 23 mental health nurses per 100,000 residents, to be reached gradually over four years.
- It would create a state suicide prevention protocol, with a free crisis phone line, a suicide data registry and specific training for health, education, emergency and media professionals.
- It would reduce coercion: it would push to eliminate mechanical restraint, restrict involuntary commitment to cases under an organic law A law on fundamental rights, the electoral system or other matters the Constitution reserves. It needs an absolute majority in the Congreso: 176 votes. with judicial authorization, and create a State Mental Health Center, a Participation Council and an Ombudsman for people with mental health problems in each autonomous community.
Who it affects
- People with mental health problems: They would gain new rights in their care, such as deciding on their treatment and receiving full information.
- Children and teenagers: They would receive specialized care and protection against preventive medicalization.
- Women with mental health problems: They would get protection from sexist violence and, if they wish, support for motherhood.
- Workers: The bill would require employers to protect workers' mental health as part of workplace risk prevention.
- Health professionals and mental health services: They would have to adapt to new staffing ratios, time guarantees, training and registries.
Words worth knowing
- Iatrogenia (iatrogenic harm)
- Harm or worsening of health caused by medical care or its treatments themselves.
- Contención mecánica (mechanical restraint)
- Physically immobilizing a person with straps or other means to restrict their movement.
- Documento de Voluntades Anticipadas (advance directives document)
- A document where a person states in writing which treatments they accept or refuse in the future, if they can no longer decide.
- Ley orgánica (organic law)
- A type of Spanish law that requires special majorities in Congress and is reserved for key matters such as fundamental rights.
- Consejo Interterritorial del Sistema Nacional de Salud (Interterritorial Council of the National Health System)
- Body where the central government and the autonomous communities agree on how public health care is organized across the country.
- organic law
- A law on fundamental rights, the electoral system or other matters the Constitution reserves. It needs an absolute majority in the Congreso: 176 votes.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 3 of 7 steps. It reached Amendments, and today it is unfinished.
- Introduced10 September 2021Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted14 September 2021The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments8 October 2021Groups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 9 official steps on a timeline
28 September 2021
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill by the Confederal Unidas Podemos-En Comú Podem-Galicia en Común Parliamentary Group, on General Mental Health.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 120· updated 11 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Albacete More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 6 yes · 1 no · 5 abst.
- Almería More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 4 abst.
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Ávila More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Badajoz More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Barcelona More votes in favour 26 yes · 0 no · 5 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Burgos More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Cáceres More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Cádiz More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no · 4 abst.
- Cantabria More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Ceuta Tie 0 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Córdoba More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Cuenca More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Girona More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Granada More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Huelva More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Huesca More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 4 abst.
- Jaén More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- La Rioja More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- León More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Lleida More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Lugo More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Madrid More votes in favour 20 yes · 0 no · 17 abst.
- Málaga More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no · 5 abst.
- Melilla Tie 0 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Murcia More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no · 5 abst.
- Navarra More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Ourense More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Palencia More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Salamanca More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Segovia More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Sevilla More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no · 5 abst.
- Soria More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Tarragona More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Teruel More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Toledo More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 4 abst.
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no · 7 abst.
- Valladolid More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Zamora More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Mixto, Ciudadanos, Gcup-ec-gc and GPlu. Against, most of Vasco (EAJ-PNV). 10 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 29 most voted in favour; in 0, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 29
- Against: 0
- Abstained: 14
- Tie: 9
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Republicano | 13 | 13 in favour |
| Socialista | 120 | 120 in favour |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 6 | 5 against · 1 did not vote |
| Mixto | 10 | 5 in favour · 3 against · 1 abst. · 1 did not vote |
| Ciudadanos | 9 | 9 in favour |
| Gcup-ec-gc | 35 | 35 in favour |
| GPlu | 12 | 7 in favour · 4 abst. · 1 did not vote |
| Popular en el Congreso | 88 | 85 abst. · 3 did not vote |
| VOX | 52 | 2 against · 50 abst. |
What happens next
What happens now?
The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.
It has not been presented again yet.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000158
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 120
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.