What it is
Two power levels a year for seasonal electricity users
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 5 February 2021. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso.
Official title: Private member's bill to amend Law 24/2013, of 26 December, on the electricity sector to include measures to facilitate the supply of electricity under competitive conditions to seasonal consumers.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000123· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would allow access contracts for irrigation and seasonal activities to have two different power levels over 12 months, depending on the need at each time, by notifying the supplier by phone or online at no extra cost.
- For those activities, grid tolls and system charges would be calculated with the year split into two seasons (winter and summer) and with specific time slots for the different periods of the day.
- Seasonal activities would be those serving demand for periods of at least two consecutive months or four alternating months. In any case, this includes farms, irrigation communities, seasonal tourism, and the commerce and hospitality businesses tied to that tourism.
- The Ministry would have to amend Royal Decree 1164/2001 within a maximum of 7 days from the law taking effect, and the Government would approve the implementing rules within 7 calendar days.
- The law would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette (Boletín Oficial del Estado).
Who it affects
- Farmers and irrigation communities: They could sign up for two power levels a year and pay less on their electricity bills.
- Seasonal tourism businesses: Their grid tolls would be calculated using the two seasons and special time slots.
- Shops and restaurants tied to seasonal tourism: They would get the same treatment on their electricity bills.
Words worth knowing
- Peajes de acceso (grid access tolls)
- Money paid for using the electricity transport and distribution networks.
- Término de potencia (power term)
- The fixed part of the electricity bill, paid for the contracted capacity, not for actual use.
- Cargos (system charges)
- The part of the electricity bill that covers electricity system costs, such as renewable energy support.
- Comunidad de regantes (irrigation community)
- A group of farmers who share the irrigation water of an area.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced5 February 2021Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted9 February 2021The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
20 September 2022
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill of the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress, amending Law 24/2013, of 26 December, of the electric sector to include measures to facilitate the supply of electricity under competitive conditions to seasonal consumers.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 200· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña Tie 3 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Albacete Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 7 yes · 5 no
- Almería More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Araba/Álava More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Asturias More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Barcelona More votes against 7 yes · 14 no · 9 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes against 1 yes · 7 no
- Burgos Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 5 yes · 4 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Girona Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Granada More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Huelva More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Jaén More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- León Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Lleida Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Lugo Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 20 yes · 17 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 6 yes · 5 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 6 yes · 4 no
- Navarra More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ourense Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes against 5 yes · 7 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes against 1 yes · 3 no · 2 abst.
- Teruel Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Toledo More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 9 yes · 6 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Mixto, Ciudadanos, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV) and Gcup-ec-gc. 5 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 20 most voted in favour; in 15, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 20
- Against: 15
- Abstained: 2
- Tie: 15
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 5 | 5 against |
| Republicano | 13 | 11 abst. · 2 did not vote |
| Socialista | 120 | 120 against |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 6 | 6 against |
| Mixto | 11 | 6 in favour · 3 against · 2 abst. |
| Ciudadanos | 9 | 9 in favour |
| Gcup-ec-gc | 33 | 29 against · 4 did not vote |
| GPlu | 12 | 5 in favour · 2 against · 5 abst. |
| Popular en el Congreso | 88 | 88 in favour |
| VOX | 52 | 52 in favour |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000123
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 200
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.