What it is
What the Judicial Council can do while serving in a caretaker role
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 2 December 2020. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Socialista Grupo Parlamentario Confederal de Unidas Podemos-En Comú Podem-Galicia en Común.
Official title: Organic Private member's bill to amend Organic Law 6/1985, of 1 July, on the Judiciary, for the establishment of the legal regime applicable to the General Council of the Judiciary in office.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000109· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- For the first time, the law sets out what the General Council of the Judiciary can do when its term ends without a renewal. In that situation, its activity is limited to a closed list of tasks, such as taking part in selecting judges, deciding on promotions and discipline, inspecting the courts, or drafting its own budget.
- The caretaker Council loses key powers: it cannot propose the appointment of senior judicial officials, such as the President of the Supreme Court, the Presidents of the Audiencias, or the Magistrates of the Constitutional Court. It also cannot appoint the Director of the Judicial School, the Vice President of the Supreme Court, or similar positions.
- Despite these limits, the caretaker Council may still do whatever is essential to keep the body running normally so that the justice system does not come to a standstill.
- While the Council is in a caretaker role, its President cannot dismiss the Secretary General or the Deputy Secretary General of the Council.
Who it affects
- Members of the General Council of the Judiciary: When their term ends without renewal, they serve in a caretaker role and can only perform the tasks the law allows in that situation.
- Judges and Magistrates: The caretaker Council still handles their training, postings, promotions, and discipline, but not appointments to senior positions.
- The general public: People can still file complaints about the justice system with the Council, even while it serves in a caretaker role.
- The Government: It must still hear the caretaker Council before appointing the State Attorney General.
Words worth knowing
- Consejo General del Poder Judicial (General Council of the Judiciary)
- The body that governs Spain's courts and safeguards judicial independence. It consists of the President of the Supreme Court and twenty members appointed for five years.
- Vocales
- The twenty members who, together with the President, make up the General Council of the Judiciary.
- Consejo en funciones (caretaker Council)
- The situation in which the Council keeps operating after its five-year term has ended because new members have not yet been appointed.
- Ley Orgánica (Organic Law)
- A special type of Spanish law, reserved for major matters such as fundamental rights or the organization of the judiciary, requiring a supermajority in Congress to pass.
- Potestad reglamentaria (regulatory power)
- The ability to issue implementing rules on certain matters, always respecting existing laws.
It summarizes the law as published in the BOE. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.
- Introduced2 December 2020Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted4 December 2020The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments15 January 2021Groups propose changes.
- Committee25 January 2021A committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenary16 February 2021All 350 deputies vote.
- Senate11 March 2021The Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOE24 March 2021It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 15 official steps on a timeline
11 March 2021
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Overall vote on the Private member's bill for an Organic Law amending Organic Law 6/1985, of July 1, on the Judiciary, to establish the legal regime applicable to the General Council of the Judiciary in office, given its organic nature.
This law had 7 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 20 of sitting 82· updated 11 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 5 yes · 3 no
- Albacete Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 5 yes · 7 no
- Almería More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Ávila More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Badajoz Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 26 yes · 5 no
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 7 yes · 1 no
- Burgos Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes against 4 yes · 5 no
- Cantabria More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Girona More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Granada More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Illes Balears Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Jaén More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- La Rioja Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 5 yes · 3 no
- León Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Lugo Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Madrid More votes against 17 yes · 19 no
- Málaga More votes against 5 yes · 6 no
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 4 yes · 6 no
- Navarra More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Ourense Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Palencia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Salamanca More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Segovia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 7 yes · 4 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Teruel Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Toledo More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 8 yes · 7 no
- Valladolid More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Zamora More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Gcup-ec-gc and GPlu. Against, most of Ciudadanos, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.
By province: in 21 most voted in favour; in 19, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 21
- Against: 19
- Tie: 12
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Republicano | 13 | 13 in favour |
| Socialista | 120 | 120 in favour |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 6 | 6 in favour |
| Mixto | 9 | 4 in favour · 4 against · 1 abst. |
| Ciudadanos | 10 | 10 against |
| Gcup-ec-gc | 35 | 35 in favour |
| GPlu | 12 | 12 in favour |
| Popular en el Congreso | 88 | 1 in favour · 85 against · 2 did not vote |
| VOX | 52 | 51 against · 1 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.
The same initiative in the other chamber:
- XIV Legislature, Senate Organic Private member's bill to amend Organic Law 6/1985, of 1 July, on the Judiciary, for the establishment of the legal regime applicable to the General Council of the Judiciary in office.
Published in the BOE: Organic Law 4/2021, of March 29, amending Organic Law 6/1985, of July 1, on the Judiciary, to establish the legal regime applicable to the General Council of the Judiciary in office.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000109
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 20 of sitting 82
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- BOE, BOE-A-2021-4907
The law as published.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.