Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

What the Judicial Council can do while serving in a caretaker role

BOE step 7 of 7 · Passed

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 2 December 2020. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Socialista Grupo Parlamentario Confederal de Unidas Podemos-En Comú Podem-Galicia en Común.

Official title: Organic Private member's bill to amend Organic Law 6/1985, of 1 July, on the Judiciary, for the establishment of the legal regime applicable to the General Council of the Judiciary in office.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000109· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. For the first time, the law sets out what the General Council of the Judiciary can do when its term ends without a renewal. In that situation, its activity is limited to a closed list of tasks, such as taking part in selecting judges, deciding on promotions and discipline, inspecting the courts, or drafting its own budget.
  2. The caretaker Council loses key powers: it cannot propose the appointment of senior judicial officials, such as the President of the Supreme Court, the Presidents of the Audiencias, or the Magistrates of the Constitutional Court. It also cannot appoint the Director of the Judicial School, the Vice President of the Supreme Court, or similar positions.
  3. Despite these limits, the caretaker Council may still do whatever is essential to keep the body running normally so that the justice system does not come to a standstill.
  4. While the Council is in a caretaker role, its President cannot dismiss the Secretary General or the Deputy Secretary General of the Council.

Who it affects

  • Members of the General Council of the Judiciary: When their term ends without renewal, they serve in a caretaker role and can only perform the tasks the law allows in that situation.
  • Judges and Magistrates: The caretaker Council still handles their training, postings, promotions, and discipline, but not appointments to senior positions.
  • The general public: People can still file complaints about the justice system with the Council, even while it serves in a caretaker role.
  • The Government: It must still hear the caretaker Council before appointing the State Attorney General.

Words worth knowing

Consejo General del Poder Judicial (General Council of the Judiciary)
The body that governs Spain's courts and safeguards judicial independence. It consists of the President of the Supreme Court and twenty members appointed for five years.
Vocales
The twenty members who, together with the President, make up the General Council of the Judiciary.
Consejo en funciones (caretaker Council)
The situation in which the Council keeps operating after its five-year term has ended because new members have not yet been appointed.
Ley Orgánica (Organic Law)
A special type of Spanish law, reserved for major matters such as fundamental rights or the organization of the judiciary, requiring a supermajority in Congress to pass.
Potestad reglamentaria (regulatory power)
The ability to issue implementing rules on certain matters, always respecting existing laws.

It summarizes the law as published in the BOE. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.

  1. Introduced2 December 2020Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted4 December 2020The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments15 January 2021Groups propose changes.
  4. Committee25 January 2021A committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary16 February 2021All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senate11 March 2021The Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOE24 March 2021It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 15 official steps on a timeline
Dec 2020Dec 2020Dec 2020Dec 2020Jan 2021Jan 2021Jan 2021Jan 2021Jan 2021Feb 2021Feb 2021Feb 2021Feb 2021Mar 2021Mar 2021Mar 202111. 2 December 2020: Presentación22. 4 December 2020: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 04/12/2020 hasta 09/12/202033. 4 December 2020: Calificación44. 9 December 2020: Gobierno Contestación desde 09/12/2020 hasta 09/12/202055. 9 December 2020: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 09/12/2020 hasta 15/12/202066. 15 December 2020: Mesa del Congreso Acuerdo subsiguiente a la toma en consideración desde 15/12/2020 hasta 13/01/202177. 13 January 2021: Comisión de Justicia Publicación desde 13/01/2021 hasta 15/01/202188. 15 January 2021: Comisión de Justicia Enmiendas desde 15/01/2021 hasta 26/01/202199. 25 January 2021: Comisión de Justicia Mesa - Calificación desde 25/01/2021 hasta 25/01/20211010. 25 January 2021: Comisión de Justicia Debate de totalidad desde 25/01/2021 hasta 28/01/20211111. 26 January 2021: Comisión de Justicia Informe desde 26/01/2021 hasta 04/02/20211212. 4 February 2021: Comisión de Justicia Dictamen desde 04/02/2021 hasta 16/02/20211313. 16 February 2021: Pleno Aprobación desde 16/02/2021 hasta 11/03/20211414. 11 March 2021: Senado desde 11/03/2021 hasta 24/03/20211515. 24 March 2021: Concluido - (Aprobado con modificaciones) desde 24/03/2021 hasta 20/04/2021

11 March 2021

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 196 yes · 150 no · 1 abst.

Voted on: Overall vote on the Private member's bill for an Organic Law amending Organic Law 6/1985, of July 1, on the Judiciary, to establish the legal regime applicable to the General Council of the Judiciary in office, given its organic nature.

This law had 7 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 20 of sitting 82· updated 11 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Gcup-ec-gc and GPlu. Against, most of Ciudadanos, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.

By province: in 21 most voted in favour; in 19, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 21
  • Against: 19
  • Tie: 12
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu5
5 in favour
Republicano13
13 in favour
Socialista120
120 in favour
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)6
6 in favour
Mixto9
4 in favour · 4 against · 1 abst.
Ciudadanos10
10 against
Gcup-ec-gc35
35 in favour
GPlu12
12 in favour
Popular en el Congreso88
1 in favour · 85 against · 2 did not vote
VOX52
51 against · 1 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.

The same initiative in the other chamber:

Published in the BOE: Organic Law 4/2021, of March 29, amending Organic Law 6/1985, of July 1, on the Judiciary, to establish the legal regime applicable to the General Council of the Judiciary in office.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.