What it is
Proposal to coordinate and regulate fire services across Spain
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 7 September 2020. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Confederal de Unidas Podemos-En Comú Podem-Galicia en Común.
Official title: Private member's bill on the coordination of prevention, fire extinguishing and rescue services within the framework of the National Civil Protection System.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000082· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would organize the Fire Prevention, Suppression and Rescue Services (SPEIS Spanish acronym for Fire Prevention, Suppression and Rescue Services: the fire services.), known as fire services, across the country, and set basic criteria to coordinate them. Today no such common framework exists, even though a 1985 law already called for a specific statute.
- Fire services would have to be free and available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. A charge would only be possible if someone requests the service in bad faith or through serious negligence.
- Operational staff of the SPEIS would be career civil servants and would have the status of authority agents while on duty or responding to an emergency, anywhere in the country.
- Two coordination bodies would be created: the Dirección General de Bomberos, under the Ministry of the Interior, and a State Commission for the Coordination of the SPEIS with representation from autonomous communities, municipalities, unions and other services.
- Operational staff would be entitled to life insurance and civil liability insurance, legal defense paid by the administration, and could move to a 'second activity' status if their physical or mental capacity declines, with adapted duties and no loss of pay.
- The Government would have to create the new bodies within one year, send Parliament a Basic Statute for Firefighters within six months, and create an autonomous body for airport fire services within two years.
Who it affects
- Fire services and their staff: For the first time they would have a common nationwide framework: naming, duties, training, uniforms and working conditions.
- Municipalities with over 20,000 residents: They would have to keep guaranteeing fire suppression services, delivered directly and by career civil servants.
- Autonomous communities: They would have to adapt their fire service rules to this law within a maximum of two years.
- The Ministry of the Interior: It would have to create the Dirección General de Bomberos and the State Coordination Commission, and lead nationwide coordination.
- The general public: People would have a free, permanent and more uniform fire service across the whole territory.
Words worth knowing
- SPEIS
- Spanish acronym for Fire Prevention, Suppression and Rescue Services: the fire services.
- Funcionario de carrera
- Career civil servant: a public employee who passed competitive exams and has a permanent post, not a temporary one.
- Agente de la autoridad
- Authority agent: a person whose orders and reports have legal force while on duty, as with the police.
- Segunda actividad
- Second activity: a status in which a firefighter no longer in full physical shape moves to adapted duties, without a pay cut.
- Isócronas
- Isochrones: areas reachable from a fire station within a set time; used to decide where to locate stations.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 4 of 7 steps. It reached Committee, and today it is unfinished.
- Introduced7 September 2020Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted15 September 2020The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments23 October 2020Groups propose changes.
- Committee23 December 2020A committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 12 official steps on a timeline
4 February 2021
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Vote on the amendment to the whole with alternative text to the Private member's bill on the coordination of prevention, fire extinguishing and rescue services within the framework of the National Civil Protection System, submitted by the Plural Parliamentary Group (Mrs. Nogueras i Camero).
This law had 2 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 12 of sitting 73· updated 11 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 1 yes · 7 no
- Albacete More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 0 yes · 12 no
- Almería More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Araba/Álava Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Asturias More votes against 0 yes · 7 no
- Ávila More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Badajoz More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Barcelona More votes against 13 yes · 19 no
- Bizkaia Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Burgos More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Cáceres More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Cádiz More votes against 0 yes · 9 no
- Cantabria More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Córdoba More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Cuenca More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Girona More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Granada More votes against 0 yes · 7 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Huelva More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Huesca More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 0 yes · 8 no
- Jaén More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- La Rioja More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 0 yes · 7 no
- León More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Lugo More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Madrid More votes against 0 yes · 37 no
- Málaga More votes against 0 yes · 11 no
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 0 yes · 10 no
- Navarra More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Ourense More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Palencia More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 0 yes · 7 no
- Salamanca More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 0 yes · 7 no
- Segovia More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Sevilla More votes against 0 yes · 12 no
- Soria More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Tarragona Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Teruel More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Toledo More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 0 yes · 14 no · 1 abst.
- Valladolid More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Zamora More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 0 yes · 7 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Vasco (EAJ-PNV) and GPlu. Against, most of Socialista, Mixto, Ciudadanos, Gcup-ec-gc, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. 5 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 3 most voted in favour; in 46, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 3
- Against: 46
- Tie: 3
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Republicano | 13 | 13 in favour |
| Socialista | 120 | 120 against |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 6 | 6 in favour |
| Mixto | 9 | 2 in favour · 6 against · 1 did not vote |
| Ciudadanos | 10 | 10 against |
| Gcup-ec-gc | 35 | 35 against |
| GPlu | 12 | 9 in favour · 2 against · 1 abst. |
| Popular en el Congreso | 88 | 88 against |
| VOX | 52 | 52 against |
What happens next
What happens now?
The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.
It has not been presented again yet.
Presented before in:
- XII Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Unfinished Bill to coordinate and regulate fire services across Spain
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000082
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 12 of sitting 73
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.