Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Proposal to coordinate and regulate fire services across Spain

Committee step 4 of 7 · Unfinished

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 7 September 2020. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Confederal de Unidas Podemos-En Comú Podem-Galicia en Común.

Official title: Private member's bill on the coordination of prevention, fire extinguishing and rescue services within the framework of the National Civil Protection System.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000082· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would organize the Fire Prevention, Suppression and Rescue Services (SPEIS Spanish acronym for Fire Prevention, Suppression and Rescue Services: the fire services.), known as fire services, across the country, and set basic criteria to coordinate them. Today no such common framework exists, even though a 1985 law already called for a specific statute.
  2. Fire services would have to be free and available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. A charge would only be possible if someone requests the service in bad faith or through serious negligence.
  3. Operational staff of the SPEIS would be career civil servants and would have the status of authority agents while on duty or responding to an emergency, anywhere in the country.
  4. Two coordination bodies would be created: the Dirección General de Bomberos, under the Ministry of the Interior, and a State Commission for the Coordination of the SPEIS with representation from autonomous communities, municipalities, unions and other services.
  5. Operational staff would be entitled to life insurance and civil liability insurance, legal defense paid by the administration, and could move to a 'second activity' status if their physical or mental capacity declines, with adapted duties and no loss of pay.
  6. The Government would have to create the new bodies within one year, send Parliament a Basic Statute for Firefighters within six months, and create an autonomous body for airport fire services within two years.

Who it affects

  • Fire services and their staff: For the first time they would have a common nationwide framework: naming, duties, training, uniforms and working conditions.
  • Municipalities with over 20,000 residents: They would have to keep guaranteeing fire suppression services, delivered directly and by career civil servants.
  • Autonomous communities: They would have to adapt their fire service rules to this law within a maximum of two years.
  • The Ministry of the Interior: It would have to create the Dirección General de Bomberos and the State Coordination Commission, and lead nationwide coordination.
  • The general public: People would have a free, permanent and more uniform fire service across the whole territory.

Words worth knowing

SPEIS
Spanish acronym for Fire Prevention, Suppression and Rescue Services: the fire services.
Funcionario de carrera
Career civil servant: a public employee who passed competitive exams and has a permanent post, not a temporary one.
Agente de la autoridad
Authority agent: a person whose orders and reports have legal force while on duty, as with the police.
Segunda actividad
Second activity: a status in which a firefighter no longer in full physical shape moves to adapted duties, without a pay cut.
Isócronas
Isochrones: areas reachable from a fire station within a set time; used to decide where to locate stations.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 4 of 7 steps. It reached Committee, and today it is unfinished.

  1. Introduced7 September 2020Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted15 September 2020The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments23 October 2020Groups propose changes.
  4. Committee23 December 2020A committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 12 official steps on a timeline
Sept 2020Dec 2020Mar 2021Jun 2021Sept 2021Dec 2021Mar 2022Jun 2022Sept 2022Dec 2022Mar 202311. 7 September 2020: Presentación22. 15 September 2020: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 15/09/2020 hasta 18/09/202033. 15 September 2020: Calificación44. 18 September 2020: Gobierno Contestación desde 18/09/2020 hasta 05/10/202055. 5 October 2020: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 05/10/2020 hasta 13/10/202066. 13 October 2020: Mesa del Congreso Acuerdo subsiguiente a la toma en consideración desde 13/10/2020 hasta 20/10/202077. 20 October 2020: Comisión de Interior Publicación desde 20/10/2020 hasta 23/10/202088. 23 October 2020: Comisión de Interior Enmiendas desde 23/10/2020 hasta 18/11/202199. 13 November 2020: Comisión de Interior Mesa - Calificación desde 13/11/2020 hasta 23/12/20201010. 23 December 2020: Comisión de Interior Debate de totalidad desde 23/12/2020 hasta 04/02/20211111. 18 November 2021: Comisión de Interior Informe desde 18/11/2021 hasta 30/05/20231212. 30 May 2023: Concluido - (Caducado) desde 30/05/2023 hasta 16/06/2023

4 February 2021

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 35 yes · 313 no · 1 abst.

Voted on: Vote on the amendment to the whole with alternative text to the Private member's bill on the coordination of prevention, fire extinguishing and rescue services within the framework of the National Civil Protection System, submitted by the Plural Parliamentary Group (Mrs. Nogueras i Camero).

This law had 2 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 12 of sitting 73· updated 11 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Vasco (EAJ-PNV) and GPlu. Against, most of Socialista, Mixto, Ciudadanos, Gcup-ec-gc, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. 5 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 3 most voted in favour; in 46, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 3
  • Against: 46
  • Tie: 3
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu5
5 in favour
Republicano13
13 in favour
Socialista120
120 against
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)6
6 in favour
Mixto9
2 in favour · 6 against · 1 did not vote
Ciudadanos10
10 against
Gcup-ec-gc35
35 against
GPlu12
9 in favour · 2 against · 1 abst.
Popular en el Congreso88
88 against
VOX52
52 against

What happens next

What happens now?

The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.

It has not been presented again yet.

Presented before in:

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.