What it is
Proposal for a single, equal university entrance exam across Spain
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 17 July 2020. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Ciudadanos.
Official title: Private member's bill on the reform of the Evaluation for Access to University to guarantee equality of treatment and opportunities in access to university education.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000071· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill proposes a single exam to enter university, which will be combined with high school grades. The Government will set its basic features, common contents and grading criteria.
- The Government will set a fee range for the exam, and the Autonomous Communities must set the price within those limits. Waivers and reductions may be created based on family income and assets, or large or single-parent family status.
- Students are guaranteed the right to take the exam in Spanish or in their region's co-official language, and each student will choose the language when registering.
- The Autonomous Communities must publish average scores by school in their official gazettes and on an accessible website. The Government will include a yearly comparison of results by region in the State School System Indicators.
- Students with higher vocational training degrees, the European Baccalaureate or the International Baccalaureate, among other cases, could enter university without taking the exam.
- A transition period is planned: until the school year after the law takes effect, the exam will only count for university admission and will not be required to obtain the high school diploma.
Who it affects
- Students seeking university admission from high school (bachillerato): They would have to pass a single exam with common contents and criteria nationwide.
- Students in regions with a co-official language: They could choose to take the exam in Spanish or in the co-official language when registering.
- Families paying exam fees: The price would be set within a state-defined range, with possible waivers and reductions.
- Vocational training graduates and students from other education systems: They could enter university without taking the entrance exam.
- Autonomous Communities and universities: They would have to organize the exam, publish results by school, and follow the state-set calendar and fees.
Words worth knowing
- EvAU
- Evaluación para el Acceso a la Universidad: the exam required to enter university in Spain.
- Lengua cooficial
- Co-official language: a language that, along with Spanish, is official in an autonomous community, such as Catalan, Galician or Basque.
- Horquilla de tasas
- Fee range: a minimum and maximum price within which each region sets the final fee.
- Proposición de ley
- A bill introduced by a parliamentary group. It is not a law until it completes the legislative process.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced17 July 2020Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted2 September 2020The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
14 March 2023
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill of the Ciudadanos Parliamentary Group, on reform measures for the University Access Evaluation to guarantee equality of treatment and opportunities in access to university education.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 243· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Albacete Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 7 yes · 5 no
- Almería More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Araba/Álava More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Asturias More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Barcelona More votes against 5 yes · 26 no
- Bizkaia More votes against 1 yes · 6 no
- Burgos Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 5 yes · 4 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Girona More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Granada More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Huelva More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Jaén More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- León Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Lleida More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Lugo Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 19 yes · 16 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 6 yes · 5 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 6 yes · 4 no
- Navarra More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ourense Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes against 5 yes · 6 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Teruel Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Toledo More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 8 yes · 7 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Mixto, Ciudadanos, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Gcup-ec-gc and GPlu. 3 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 21 most voted in favour; in 18, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 21
- Against: 18
- Tie: 13
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 5 | 5 against |
| Republicano | 13 | 13 against |
| Socialista | 120 | 118 against · 2 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 6 | 6 against |
| Mixto | 11 | 7 in favour · 2 against · 1 abst. · 1 did not vote |
| Ciudadanos | 9 | 7 in favour · 2 did not vote |
| Gcup-ec-gc | 33 | 31 against · 2 did not vote |
| GPlu | 12 | 10 against · 2 did not vote |
| Popular en el Congreso | 88 | 88 in favour |
| VOX | 52 | 52 in favour |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000071
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 243
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.