What it is
Bill to speed up trials for property squatting crimes
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 16 July 2020. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario VOX.
Official title: Private member's bill regarding the amendment of the Royal Decree of 14 September 1882, by which the Criminal Procedure Act is approved, in order to introduce the crimes of usurpation of real estate within those included in Article 795, and to amend Article 553, in relation to those same crimes.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000070· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would add the crime of squatting (Usurpación The crime of occupying someone else's property or changing its boundaries without permission.) to the list of crimes handled through the fast-track procedure in Article 795 of the Criminal Procedure Act.
- It would also amend Article 553 so that police could enter a squatted property, evict those inside and hand possession back to the owner, if there is a complaint and signs of illegal occupation. The judge would then be informed and would rule on the property's situation.
- The explanatory statement argues that private property deserves criminal protection and that the current express eviction law is not working as quickly as expected.
Who it affects
- Owners of squatted homes or properties: They could recover their property faster, with police acting without waiting for a judge.
- People occupying someone else's property: They could be evicted and even arrested by police on the spot.
- Police and judges: They would get new rules for squatting cases, with later judicial review.
Words worth knowing
- Usurpación
- The crime of occupying someone else's property or changing its boundaries without permission.
- Ley de Enjuiciamiento Criminal
- The Spanish law governing criminal procedure.
- Procedimiento rápido (juicio rápido)
- A shortened criminal process for certain crimes, such as flagrant theft or robbery.
- Delito flagrante
- A crime being committed or just committed when the offender is caught in the act.
- Desahucio exprés
- A civil procedure letting owners quickly recover a home that was illegally occupied.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced16 July 2020Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted2 September 2020The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
28 September 2021
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill by the VOX Parliamentary Group, regarding the amendment of the Royal Decree of September 14, 1882, approving the Criminal Procedure Law, to introduce the crimes of usurpation of real estate within those listed in Article 795, and to amend Article 553 in relation to these same crimes.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 120· updated 11 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Albacete Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 7 yes · 5 no
- Almería More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Araba/Álava More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Asturias More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Barcelona More votes against 6 yes · 24 no · 1 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes against 1 yes · 5 no
- Burgos Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 5 yes · 4 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Girona More votes against 0 yes · 5 no · 1 abst.
- Granada More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Huelva More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Jaén More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- León Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Lleida More votes against 0 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Lugo Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 20 yes · 17 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 6 yes · 5 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 6 yes · 4 no
- Navarra More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ourense More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes against 5 yes · 7 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes against 0 yes · 5 no · 1 abst.
- Teruel More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 8 yes · 7 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Ciudadanos, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Gcup-ec-gc and GPlu. 8 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 19 most voted in favour; in 24, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 19
- Against: 24
- Tie: 9
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 5 | 5 against |
| Republicano | 13 | 13 against |
| Socialista | 120 | 120 against |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 6 | 1 against · 5 did not vote |
| Mixto | 10 | 4 in favour · 5 against · 1 did not vote |
| Ciudadanos | 9 | 9 in favour |
| Gcup-ec-gc | 35 | 35 against |
| GPlu | 12 | 7 against · 4 abst. · 1 did not vote |
| Popular en el Congreso | 88 | 85 in favour · 3 did not vote |
| VOX | 52 | 52 in favour |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000070
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 120
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.