Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Proposal to equalize pay for the National Police and Civil Guard

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Rejected

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 4 March 2020. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario VOX.

Official title: Private member's bill on effective equality and salary parity of the State Security Forces and Corps with respect to regional police forces.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000044· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would establish that the specific allowance of the National Police and the Civil Guard could not be lower than what the regional police forces receive, and the Autonomous Communities would have to provide the State with information on those salaries.
  2. The rule would apply to career civil servants of the National Police and the Civil Guard.
  3. The Government would have three months to adapt destination allowances, territoriality, shift work pay, and per diems and court attendance pay to the social and geographic reality of each area.
  4. Officers in second activity or reserve would receive the pay equalization at a proportion equivalent to 80 % of that of active service officers.
  5. The Government would have three months to issue the necessary rules, after consulting the most representative unions, and the law would take effect the day after its publication in the official state gazette.
  6. The proposal is justified by a pay gap that has existed for more than 30 years between the State law enforcement forces and the Mozos de Escuadra, the Policía Foral and the Ertzaintza, even though the State forces have broader duties. It relies on several court rulings that consider lower pay for the same work discriminatory.

Who it affects

  • Career civil servants of the National Police: Their specific allowance would be guaranteed to be equal to or higher than that of the regional police forces.
  • Civil servants of the Civil Guard: The bill would affect them the same way as the National Police regarding pay.
  • Officers in second activity or reserve: They would receive the equalization at 80 % of the active service amount.
  • Autonomous Communities with their own police forces: They would have to give the State information on those officers' pay.
  • The Government: It would have three months to develop the rule and amend Royal Decree 950/2005.

Words worth knowing

Complemento específico (specific allowance)
Part of a civil servant's salary paid for the specific features of their job.
Segunda actividad o reserva (second activity or reserve)
Situations in which an officer stops performing operational service, usually due to age or other causes, but remains a civil servant.
Turnicidad (shift work pay)
An allowance paid for working in shifts, for example at night or on weekends.
Policías Autonómicas (regional police forces)
Police bodies that report to an Autonomous Community: the Mozos de Escuadra, the Policía Foral and the Ertzaintza.
Proposición de ley (bill)
A text in the form of a law introduced by members of Congress for debate; it is not an approved law until it is voted on and published.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced4 March 2020Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted10 March 2020The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
Mar 2020Apr 2020May 202011. 4 March 2020: Presentación22. 10 March 2020: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 10/03/2020 hasta 13/03/202033. 10 March 2020: Calificación44. 13 March 2020: Gobierno Contestación desde 13/03/2020 hasta 16/05/202055. 16 May 2020: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 16/05/2020 hasta 04/06/202066. 4 June 2020: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 04/06/2020 hasta 08/06/2020

4 June 2020

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 152 yes · 192 no · 1 abst.

Voted on: Private member's bill by the VOX Parliamentary Group, regarding the effective equality and salary parity of the State Security Forces and Corps with respect to the regional Police.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 3 of sitting 25· updated 11 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Mixto, Ciudadanos, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Gcup-ec-gc and GPlu. 4 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 18 most voted in favour; in 20, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 18
  • Against: 20
  • Tie: 14
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu5
4 against · 1 did not vote
Republicano13
12 against · 1 did not vote
Socialista120
120 against
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)6
6 against
Mixto9
5 in favour · 3 against · 1 abst.
Ciudadanos10
10 in favour
Gcup-ec-gc35
35 against
GPlu12
12 against
Popular en el Congreso88
88 in favour
VOX52
49 in favour · 3 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.