What it is
Proposal to equalize pay for the National Police and Civil Guard
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 4 March 2020. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario VOX.
Official title: Private member's bill on effective equality and salary parity of the State Security Forces and Corps with respect to regional police forces.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000044· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would establish that the specific allowance of the National Police and the Civil Guard could not be lower than what the regional police forces receive, and the Autonomous Communities would have to provide the State with information on those salaries.
- The rule would apply to career civil servants of the National Police and the Civil Guard.
- The Government would have three months to adapt destination allowances, territoriality, shift work pay, and per diems and court attendance pay to the social and geographic reality of each area.
- Officers in second activity or reserve would receive the pay equalization at a proportion equivalent to 80 % of that of active service officers.
- The Government would have three months to issue the necessary rules, after consulting the most representative unions, and the law would take effect the day after its publication in the official state gazette.
- The proposal is justified by a pay gap that has existed for more than 30 years between the State law enforcement forces and the Mozos de Escuadra, the Policía Foral and the Ertzaintza, even though the State forces have broader duties. It relies on several court rulings that consider lower pay for the same work discriminatory.
Who it affects
- Career civil servants of the National Police: Their specific allowance would be guaranteed to be equal to or higher than that of the regional police forces.
- Civil servants of the Civil Guard: The bill would affect them the same way as the National Police regarding pay.
- Officers in second activity or reserve: They would receive the equalization at 80 % of the active service amount.
- Autonomous Communities with their own police forces: They would have to give the State information on those officers' pay.
- The Government: It would have three months to develop the rule and amend Royal Decree 950/2005.
Words worth knowing
- Complemento específico (specific allowance)
- Part of a civil servant's salary paid for the specific features of their job.
- Segunda actividad o reserva (second activity or reserve)
- Situations in which an officer stops performing operational service, usually due to age or other causes, but remains a civil servant.
- Turnicidad (shift work pay)
- An allowance paid for working in shifts, for example at night or on weekends.
- Policías Autonómicas (regional police forces)
- Police bodies that report to an Autonomous Community: the Mozos de Escuadra, the Policía Foral and the Ertzaintza.
- Proposición de ley (bill)
- A text in the form of a law introduced by members of Congress for debate; it is not an approved law until it is voted on and published.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced4 March 2020Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted10 March 2020The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
4 June 2020
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill by the VOX Parliamentary Group, regarding the effective equality and salary parity of the State Security Forces and Corps with respect to the regional Police.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 3 of sitting 25· updated 11 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Albacete Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 7 yes · 5 no
- Almería More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Araba/Álava More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Asturias More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Barcelona More votes against 6 yes · 25 no
- Bizkaia More votes against 1 yes · 7 no
- Burgos Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Girona More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Granada More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Huelva More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Jaén More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- León Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Lleida More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Lugo Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 20 yes · 17 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 6 yes · 5 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 6 yes · 4 no
- Navarra More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ourense Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes against 5 yes · 7 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Teruel Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Toledo More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Valencia/València Tie 7 yes · 7 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Mixto, Ciudadanos, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Gcup-ec-gc and GPlu. 4 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 18 most voted in favour; in 20, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 18
- Against: 20
- Tie: 14
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 5 | 4 against · 1 did not vote |
| Republicano | 13 | 12 against · 1 did not vote |
| Socialista | 120 | 120 against |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 6 | 6 against |
| Mixto | 9 | 5 in favour · 3 against · 1 abst. |
| Ciudadanos | 10 | 10 in favour |
| Gcup-ec-gc | 35 | 35 against |
| GPlu | 12 | 12 against |
| Popular en el Congreso | 88 | 88 in favour |
| VOX | 52 | 49 in favour · 3 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000044
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 3 of sitting 25
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.