Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill proposes searching for and compensating victims of stolen babies

Committee step 4 of 7 · Unfinished

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 26 February 2020. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Plural Grupo Parlamentario Euskal Herria Bildu Grupo Parlamentario Socialista Grupo Parlamentario Republicano.

Official title: Private member's bill on stolen babies in the Spanish State.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000039· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would recognize the right to truth, justice, reparation and guarantees of non-repetition for victims of baby theft in Spain since July 17, 1936, and would make it easier to investigate. Victims would include people who were taken as babies and relatives up to the fourth degree, who could claim that status through a sworn statement with a plausible account, without needing proof.
  2. Public authorities would have to search for children who may have been victims of abduction or forced disappearance, and private parties covered by the bill (hospitals, religious congregations, the Catholic Church, among others) would have three months to answer victims' requests.
  3. Victims would have the right to access public and private archives and records, including cemetery books, adoption records and homes for unmarried mothers, and to learn their true identity, with free medical, legal and psychological assistance and mediation services for reunions.
  4. The bill would create a State Database of Affected People under the direction of the Special Prosecutor's Office and a free, state-wide single DNA Bank, where victims who have filed a complaint could give samples without a court order, with analysis within three months.
  5. It would create the State Commission for the Right to Identity, which would recognize victim status, plus a Special Prosecutor's Office on Stolen Babies and a specialized judicial police unit. The Government could approve extraordinary compensation by Royal Decree within six months.
  6. The law would take effect the day after its publication in the official state gazette (BOE), but its financial obligations could not be enforced until the next General State Budget Law takes effect.

Who it affects

  • People stolen as babies and their relatives up to the fourth degree: They would be recognized as victims, with rights to truth, identity, reparation and free support.
  • Public administrations, hospitals and civil registries: They would have to search for those affected, preserve the archives and give access to documents.
  • Private parties such as the Catholic Church, congregations and foundations: They would have to answer victims' requests within three months and preserve their archives.
  • The Government: It could approve extraordinary compensation by Royal Decree and issue the implementing rules.

Words worth knowing

Declaración jurada (sworn statement)
A statement of facts made before the authority, promising to tell the truth, without needing to provide proof.
Lesa humanidad (crime against humanity)
Very serious crimes committed on a widespread or systematic basis against the population, such as murder or forced disappearance.
Cuarto grado (fourth degree of kinship)
Degree of family relationship: it includes, for example, first cousins and second uncles/aunts.
Fiscalía Especial (Special Prosecutor's Office)
A body of the Public Prosecutor's Office dedicated to one specific type of case, in this instance stolen babies.
Real Decreto (Royal Decree)
A rule approved by the Government, without going through Congress.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 4 of 7 steps. It reached Committee, and today it is unfinished.

  1. Introduced26 February 2020Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted3 March 2020The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments17 July 2020Groups propose changes.
  4. Committee2 March 2023A committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 10 official steps on a timeline
Dec 2020Dec 2021Dec 202211. 26 February 2020: Presentación22. 3 March 2020: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 03/03/2020 hasta 06/03/202033. 3 March 2020: Calificación44. 6 March 2020: Gobierno Contestación desde 06/03/2020 hasta 08/05/202055. 8 May 2020: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 08/05/2020 hasta 23/06/202066. 23 June 2020: Mesa del Congreso Acuerdo subsiguiente a la toma en consideración desde 23/06/2020 hasta 14/07/202077. 14 July 2020: Comisión de Justicia Publicación desde 14/07/2020 hasta 17/07/202088. 17 July 2020: Comisión de Justicia Enmiendas desde 17/07/2020 hasta 02/03/202399. 2 March 2023: Comisión de Justicia Informe desde 02/03/2023 hasta 30/05/20231010. 30 May 2023: Concluido - (Caducado) desde 30/05/2023 hasta 16/06/2023

23 June 2020

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 296 yes · 53 no

Voted on: Private member's bill by the Plural, Euskal Herria Bildu, Socialist and Republican Parliamentary Groups, on stolen babies in the Spanish State.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 30· updated 11 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Ciudadanos, Gcup-ec-gc, GPlu and Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of VOX. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.

By province: in 51 most voted in favour; in 1, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 51
  • Against: 1
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu5
5 in favour
Republicano13
13 in favour
Socialista120
120 in favour
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)6
6 in favour
Mixto9
7 in favour · 1 against · 1 did not vote
Ciudadanos10
10 in favour
Gcup-ec-gc35
35 in favour
GPlu12
12 in favour
Popular en el Congreso88
88 in favour
VOX52
52 against

What happens next

What happens now?

The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.

It has not been presented again yet.

Presented before in:

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.