Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Proposal to limit military courts to wartime cases

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Rejected

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 14 February 2020. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Republicano.

Official title: Organic Private member's bill on the delimitation of military justice.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000033· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would limit military courts to cases of war, state of siege, or international armed conflict. All other cases would go to ordinary courts.
  2. It would amend the law that organizes the military justice system so that it only acts during war, state of siege, or international armed conflict. It would also remove one article and change the rules on disciplinary sanctions.
  3. It would amend the Military Criminal Code so that it only applies in situations of war, state of siege, or armed conflict. It would also require that any soldier sentenced to prison lose their job.
  4. The law would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette (Boletín Oficial del Estado).

Who it affects

  • Members of the Armed Forces: They would be tried by ordinary courts in peacetime and would lose their job if sentenced to prison.
  • Victims of crimes committed by soldiers: Their complaints about sexual offenses or corruption would be tried in ordinary courts, with the same consequences regardless of the place or the victim's job.
  • Military courts: They would stop trying crimes in peacetime and would be limited to periods of war, state of siege, or international armed conflict.

Words worth knowing

Proposición de ley
A bill introduced by a parliamentary group to become a law. It is not approved yet.
Jurisdicción militar
The courts that try crimes and offenses committed by members of the military.
Estado de sitio (state of siege)
An exceptional measure the Government can declare in very serious situations, such as invasion or severe public unrest.
Código Penal Militar (Military Criminal Code)
The law listing the crimes and punishments specific to the military.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced14 February 2020Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted18 February 2020The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
Feb 2020Mar 2020Apr 2020May 202011. 14 February 2020: Presentación22. 18 February 2020: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 18/02/2020 hasta 21/02/202033. 18 February 2020: Calificación44. 21 February 2020: Gobierno Contestación desde 21/02/2020 hasta 22/04/202055. 22 April 2020: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 22/04/2020 hasta 11/06/202066. 11 June 2020: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 11/06/2020 hasta 17/06/2020

11 June 2020

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 72 yes · 274 no · 1 abst.

Voted on: Organic Private member's bill by the Republican Parliamentary Group, on the delimitation of military justice.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 5 of sitting 27· updated 11 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Gcup-ec-gc and GPlu. Against, most of Socialista, Mixto, Ciudadanos, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. 3 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 7 most voted in favour; in 45, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 7
  • Against: 45
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu5
5 in favour
Republicano13
13 in favour
Socialista120
120 against
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)6
6 in favour
Mixto9
2 in favour · 5 against · 1 abst. · 1 did not vote
Ciudadanos10
10 against
Gcup-ec-gc35
34 in favour · 1 did not vote
GPlu12
12 in favour
Popular en el Congreso88
87 against · 1 did not vote
VOX52
52 against

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.