What it is
Proposal to limit military courts to wartime cases
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 14 February 2020. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Republicano.
Official title: Organic Private member's bill on the delimitation of military justice.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000033· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would limit military courts to cases of war, state of siege, or international armed conflict. All other cases would go to ordinary courts.
- It would amend the law that organizes the military justice system so that it only acts during war, state of siege, or international armed conflict. It would also remove one article and change the rules on disciplinary sanctions.
- It would amend the Military Criminal Code so that it only applies in situations of war, state of siege, or armed conflict. It would also require that any soldier sentenced to prison lose their job.
- The law would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette (Boletín Oficial del Estado).
Who it affects
- Members of the Armed Forces: They would be tried by ordinary courts in peacetime and would lose their job if sentenced to prison.
- Victims of crimes committed by soldiers: Their complaints about sexual offenses or corruption would be tried in ordinary courts, with the same consequences regardless of the place or the victim's job.
- Military courts: They would stop trying crimes in peacetime and would be limited to periods of war, state of siege, or international armed conflict.
Words worth knowing
- Proposición de ley
- A bill introduced by a parliamentary group to become a law. It is not approved yet.
- Jurisdicción militar
- The courts that try crimes and offenses committed by members of the military.
- Estado de sitio (state of siege)
- An exceptional measure the Government can declare in very serious situations, such as invasion or severe public unrest.
- Código Penal Militar (Military Criminal Code)
- The law listing the crimes and punishments specific to the military.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced14 February 2020Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted18 February 2020The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
11 June 2020
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Organic Private member's bill by the Republican Parliamentary Group, on the delimitation of military justice.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 5 of sitting 27· updated 11 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 2 yes · 6 no
- Albacete More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 1 yes · 11 no
- Almería More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Asturias More votes against 1 yes · 6 no
- Ávila More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Badajoz More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 18 yes · 14 no
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 5 yes · 3 no
- Burgos More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Cáceres More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Cádiz More votes against 1 yes · 8 no
- Cantabria More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Córdoba More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Cuenca More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Girona More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Granada More votes against 1 yes · 6 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Huelva More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Huesca More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 2 yes · 6 no
- Jaén More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- La Rioja More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 1 yes · 6 no
- León More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Lugo More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Madrid More votes against 7 yes · 30 no
- Málaga More votes against 1 yes · 10 no
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 1 yes · 9 no
- Navarra More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ourense More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Palencia More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 1 yes · 6 no
- Salamanca More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 1 yes · 6 no
- Segovia More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Sevilla More votes against 2 yes · 10 no
- Soria More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Teruel More votes against 0 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Toledo More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 3 yes · 12 no
- Valladolid More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Zamora More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 1 yes · 6 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Gcup-ec-gc and GPlu. Against, most of Socialista, Mixto, Ciudadanos, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. 3 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 7 most voted in favour; in 45, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 7
- Against: 45
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Republicano | 13 | 13 in favour |
| Socialista | 120 | 120 against |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 6 | 6 in favour |
| Mixto | 9 | 2 in favour · 5 against · 1 abst. · 1 did not vote |
| Ciudadanos | 10 | 10 against |
| Gcup-ec-gc | 35 | 34 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| GPlu | 12 | 12 in favour |
| Popular en el Congreso | 88 | 87 against · 1 did not vote |
| VOX | 52 | 52 against |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000033
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 5 of sitting 27
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.