What it is
Bill would protect and reward people who report corruption
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 12 February 2020. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario VOX.
Official title: Private member's bill on the comprehensive protection of corruption whistleblowers.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000031· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would create a protection statute for corruption whistleblowers, including a reward of 10% of the recovered money, and an independent authority to handle reports.
- Public and private entities would have to set up internal reporting channels. These would have to accept anonymous reports and respond to the whistleblower within a maximum of three months.
- The bill would create the Independent Authority for the Protection of Corruption Whistleblowers, with powers to investigate, handle reports, protect whistleblowers and impose sanctions. Its president would be elected by the Congress of Deputies (Congreso de los Diputados) by a three-fifths majority, for a non-renewable six-year term.
- Anyone could report to the Authority through a confidential channel, including anonymously. The Authority would have fifteen days to decide to open proceedings and a maximum of three months, extendable to six, for the preliminary review of the facts.
- Whistleblowers who meet the requirements would be entitled to confidentiality, free legal advice, indemnity, compensation and the 10% reward on recovered money. Retaliatory decisions would be void unless it is proven they are unrelated to the report.
- The bill would define offenses with fines from 200 to 400,000 euros, for example obstructing investigations, failing to comply with protection measures or filing knowingly false reports.
Who it affects
- People working in the public or private sector who learn of wrongdoing that harms public funds: They could report confidentially or anonymously and receive protection, advice and a reward
- Private entities with 50 or more employees, turnover or annual balance of 10 million euros or more, or in financial services or vulnerable to money laundering: They would have to create internal reporting channels
- Journalists and the media: They would be protected when publishing information from their sources about corruption
- Public authorities and employees: They would have to report known wrongdoing to the Authority and could be sanctioned
- Autonomous Communities and Cities with a Statute of Autonomy: They would have to set up their own protection body or sign an agreement with the Authority within one year
Words worth knowing
- Indemnidad (indemnity)
- A guarantee that the whistleblower will suffer no harm to their job or career for having reported
- Erario público (public treasury)
- The money and resources of public administrations
- Multas coercitivas (coercive fines)
- Repeated fines used to force someone to comply with an order
- Proposición de ley (bill)
- A text by which a parliamentary group proposes a law; it is not an approved law until it goes through the legislative process and is voted on
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced12 February 2020Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted18 February 2020The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
22 June 2021
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill by the VOX Parliamentary Group, on the comprehensive protection of corruption whistleblowers.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 109· updated 11 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 2 yes · 5 no
- Albacete More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 7 yes · 5 no
- Almería More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Araba/Álava More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Asturias More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Barcelona More votes against 6 yes · 25 no
- Bizkaia More votes against 1 yes · 7 no
- Burgos Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Girona More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Granada More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Huelva More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Jaén More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- León Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Lleida More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Lugo Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 20 yes · 15 no · 2 abst.
- Málaga Tie 5 yes · 5 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 6 yes · 4 no
- Navarra More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ourense More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes against 5 yes · 7 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Teruel Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Toledo More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 8 yes · 7 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Mixto, Ciudadanos, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Gcup-ec-gc and GPlu. 7 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 18 most voted in favour; in 22, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 18
- Against: 22
- Tie: 12
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 5 | 5 against |
| Republicano | 13 | 13 against |
| Socialista | 120 | 120 against |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 6 | 6 against |
| Mixto | 10 | 5 in favour · 3 against · 1 abst. · 1 did not vote |
| Ciudadanos | 9 | 7 in favour · 2 did not vote |
| Gcup-ec-gc | 35 | 35 against |
| GPlu | 12 | 9 against · 2 abst. · 1 did not vote |
| Popular en el Congreso | 88 | 85 in favour · 1 against · 2 did not vote |
| VOX | 52 | 52 in favour |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Presented before in:
- XIII Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Unfinished Protection and rewards for people who report corruption
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000031
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 109
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.