What it is
Twelve-month time limit for judicial investigations in Spain
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 31 January 2020. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Confederal de Unidas Podemos-En Comú Podem-Galicia en Común.
Official title: Private member's bill amending Article 324 of the Criminal Procedure Law.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000024· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- Judicial investigations must be completed within a maximum of twelve months from the opening of the case. The judge may extend it in periods of six months or less, explaining the reasons and pending steps in a reasoned ruling.
- Investigation steps ordered before the deadline or its extensions remain valid even if they arrive later. But if the judge does not issue the extension in time, or it is overturned on appeal, steps ordered after that date are not valid.
- The judge must close the investigation when it has served its purpose. Once the deadline and extensions run out, the judge will issue an order closing the summary proceedings or the appropriate ruling in abbreviated proceedings.
- The new rule also applies to cases already underway when the law takes effect. For those cases, the day the law takes effect counts as the starting point of the time limit.
Who it affects
- Investigating judges: They must watch the twelve-month deadline, give reasons for extensions, and close the investigation on time.
- People under investigation in a criminal case: They gain a time limit on the investigation, which the preamble links to the presumption of innocence and a trial without delays.
- Parties to criminal proceedings: They may request extensions and must be heard before extensions are granted.
- Cases already in progress: The new law applies to them, with the deadline counted from the day it takes effect.
Words worth knowing
- Instrucción (investigation phase)
- The early stage of a criminal case where the judge investigates the facts before trial.
- Diligencias (investigation steps)
- Investigation actions, such as statements, searches, or reports.
- Auto (court order)
- A written ruling by a judge that explains and decides something.
- Sumario (summary proceedings)
- The set of investigation records in the ordinary criminal process.
- De oficio (on the court's own initiative)
- When the judge acts without any party asking for it.
It summarizes the law as published in the BOE. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.
- Introduced31 January 2020Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted4 February 2020The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments28 February 2020Groups propose changes.
- Committee10 June 2020A committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenaryno dateAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senate25 June 2020The Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOE15 July 2020It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 14 official steps on a timeline
17 June 2020
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Vote on the amendment to the whole with alternative text to the Private member's bill to repeal the maximum time limit provided for the investigation in the Criminal Procedure Law, submitted by the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress.
This law had 2 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 16 of sitting 29· updated 11 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Albacete More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 3 yes · 9 no
- Almería More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Araba/Álava More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Asturias More votes against 2 yes · 5 no
- Ávila More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Badajoz More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Barcelona More votes against 2 yes · 26 no · 4 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes against 1 yes · 6 no
- Burgos Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Cádiz More votes against 2 yes · 7 no
- Cantabria More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Córdoba More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Cuenca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Girona More votes against 0 yes · 4 no · 2 abst.
- Granada More votes against 2 yes · 5 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Huelva More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 2 yes · 6 no
- Jaén More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- La Rioja Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 2 yes · 6 no
- León More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Lleida More votes against 1 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Lugo Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Madrid More votes against 11 yes · 26 no
- Málaga More votes against 3 yes · 8 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes against 3 yes · 7 no
- Navarra More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ourense Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Salamanca Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 2 yes · 5 no
- Segovia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Sevilla More votes against 2 yes · 10 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes against 0 yes · 5 no · 1 abst.
- Teruel Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Toledo More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 4 yes · 11 no
- Valladolid More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Zamora More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 2 yes · 5 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Ciudadanos, Gcup-ec-gc and VOX. 10 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 2 most voted in favour; in 43, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 2
- Against: 43
- Tie: 7
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 5 | 5 against |
| Republicano | 13 | 1 in favour · 12 against |
| Socialista | 120 | 120 against |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 6 | 6 against |
| Mixto | 9 | 3 in favour · 5 against · 1 abst. |
| Ciudadanos | 10 | 1 in favour · 9 against |
| Gcup-ec-gc | 35 | 34 against · 1 did not vote |
| GPlu | 12 | 4 against · 8 abst. |
| Popular en el Congreso | 88 | 88 in favour |
| VOX | 52 | 52 against |
What happens next
What happens now?
It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.
The same initiative in the other chamber:
- XIV Legislature, Senate Private member's bill amending Article 324 of the Criminal Procedure Law.
Published in the BOE: Law 2/2020, of July 27, amending Article 324 of the Criminal Procedure Law.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000024
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 16 of sitting 29
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- BOE, BOE-A-2020-8633
The law as published.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.