Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill to protect corruption whistleblowers and create an independent watchdog

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Rejected

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 20 December 2019. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Ciudadanos.

Official title: Private member's bill on measures to combat corruption.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000009· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would grant rights to people who report corruption: confidentiality, information about the status of their report, free legal advice, psychological assistance and protection from retaliation at work, with a list of banned reprisals such as dismissal or harassment.
  2. It would regulate how reports are handled: they would be filed through a confidential channel, anonymously or identified, and the investigation must be resolved within three months, extendable to six. It could end with the case being closed, sent to the Public Prosecutor or turned into a sanctioning procedure.
  3. It would create the Independent Public Integrity Authority, replacing the Office of Conflicts of Interest. It would monitor senior officials' obligations, protect whistleblowers and be able to investigate and inspect public and private persons and entities.
  4. It would set up a sanctioning regime: fines would range from €200 to €400,000 depending on whether the offense is minor, serious or very serious, and senior officials could also be removed from office or barred from similar posts for five to ten years.
  5. It would ban pardons for corruption offenses, remove maximum time limits for criminal investigations, create the crime of illicit enrichment and make political parties, unions and business organizations civilly liable for crimes committed by their officials and employees.
  6. Before a senior official is appointed, the new Authority would issue a public, non-binding report on whether the proposed person is suitable, to reduce the Government's discretion and prevent nepotism and conflicts of interest.

Who it affects

  • Public employees and public sector staff who report corruption: They would receive protection, legal advice and a guarantee of no retaliation.
  • Senior officials of the General State Administration: They would be monitored by the new Authority and could be removed from office or barred for offenses.
  • Political parties, unions and business organizations: They would be civilly liable for crimes committed by their officials and employees.
  • Autonomous communities and local entities: They could create their own whistleblower protection bodies or assign the task to the new Authority through an agreement.

Words worth knowing

Indemnidad laboral
Guarantee that no one can harm you at work for having reported wrongdoing.
Indulto (pardon)
A Government decision that fully or partially forgives a sentence imposed by a court.
Enriquecimiento ilícito (illicit enrichment)
A crime a public official would commit if their wealth grows and they cannot explain where the money came from.
Instrucción penal (criminal investigation phase)
The first stage of a criminal court case, in which the judge investigates the facts before trial.
Alto cargo (senior official)
A person appointed to a top management post in the Administration, such as undersecretary or director general.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced20 December 2019Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted15 January 2020The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
Dec 2019Mar 202011. 20 December 2019: Presentación22. 15 January 2020: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 15/01/2020 hasta 17/01/202033. 15 January 2020: Calificación44. 17 January 2020: Gobierno Contestación desde 17/01/2020 hasta 07/03/202055. 7 March 2020: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 07/03/2020 hasta 17/06/202066. 17 June 2020: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 17/06/2020 hasta 24/06/2020

17 June 2020

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 159 yes · 178 no · 11 abst.

Voted on: Private member's bill by the Ciudadanos Parliamentary Group, on measures to fight corruption.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 18 of sitting 29· updated 11 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Ciudadanos, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Gcup-ec-gc and GPlu. 10 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 22 most voted in favour; in 18, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 22
  • Against: 18
  • Tie: 12
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu5
5 abst.
Republicano13
12 against · 1 did not vote
Socialista120
3 in favour · 117 against
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)6
6 against
Mixto9
4 in favour · 5 abst.
Ciudadanos10
10 in favour
Gcup-ec-gc35
34 against · 1 did not vote
GPlu12
2 in favour · 9 against · 1 abst.
Popular en el Congreso88
88 in favour
VOX52
52 in favour

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.