What it is
Bill proposes aid for farmers hit by drought
It is a government bill. Introduced by the Government. It was introduced on 31 March 2022. Introduced by: Gobierno.
Official title: Government bill adopting urgent support measures for the agricultural sector due to drought (originating from Royal Decree-Law 4/2022, of March 15).
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000096· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would allow farm companies and farm workers to defer payment of their Social Security contributions, with a reduced 0.5 percent interest rate and repayment terms of up to 12 monthly installments.
- It would reduce from 35 to 20 the required contributions days for seasonal farm workers in Andalusia and Extremadura to receive unemployment benefits or the farm income subsidy, through December 31, 2022.
- It would set a 20 percent reduction in net income under the objective method for farm activities in 2021, and exempt farm property from the rural property tax (IBI) in 2022 for those who lost at least 20 percent or 30 percent of income, depending on the area.
- It would create the LINEA ICO MAPA SAECA aid line: subsidized, non-repayable credits capped at 10 percent of the loan or 10,000 euros, with an initial budget of 10 million euros.
- It would set maximum 2022 rates for desalinated water and for the Júcar-Vinalopó pipeline for irrigation, between 0.295 and 0.475 euros per cubic meter, so that irrigators in the southeast can afford the cost.
- It would give the Guadalquivir River Basin Authority extraordinary powers to cut water supplies, change use priorities, replace water allocations and create user boards, with measures in force until December 31, 2022.
- It would partially or fully exempt irrigators in the Guadalquivir and Guadiana basins from the regulation fee and water use fee if their water allocation was cut by at least 40 percent.
- It would strengthen the penalty system: violating the measures would be an offense, provisional measures such as sealing facilities or suspending activities could be adopted, and the measures adopted would not be eligible for compensation.
Who it affects
- Owners of farms affected by drought and rising costs: They could apply for contribution deferrals, financial aid, income tax The personal income tax (IRPF in Spain): what people pay on what they earn from work, business or savings. reductions and exemptions from taxes and water fees.
- Seasonal farm workers in Andalusia and Extremadura: They would need fewer contribution days (20 instead of 35) to receive the subsidy or farm income benefit.
- Irrigators in southeastern Spain: They would pay legally set rates for desalinated water and water from the Júcar-Vinalopó pipeline.
- Irrigators in the Guadalquivir and Guadiana basins: They would face water restrictions and fee exemptions depending on how much their water allocation was cut.
- Municipalities and other local entities: The rural property tax exemption would reduce their revenue, which the State would compensate for.
Words worth knowing
- Real decreto-ley (royal decree-law)
- A rule with the force of law that the Government can adopt immediately in situations of extraordinary and urgent need; it must later be validated by the Congress of Deputies.
- Estimación objetiva (objective method)
- A way of calculating business income using fixed indexes instead of actual income and expenses.
- Canon de regulación (regulation fee)
- A payment made by those who use water from public regulation works, such as reservoirs.
- UTE (Unidad Territorial de Escasez)
- A zone of a river basin classified by its water scarcity level: normal, pre-alert, alert or emergency.
- Ayuda de minimis (de minimis aid)
- A small public aid that the European Union allows without prior authorization.
- income tax
- The personal income tax (IRPF in Spain): what people pay on what they earn from work, business or savings.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 3 of 7 steps. It reached Amendments, and today it is unfinished.
- Introduced31 March 2022Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted5 April 2022The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments8 April 2022Groups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 5 official steps on a timeline
12 May 2022
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Vote on the request by the Plural Parliamentary Group for the Plenary of the Chamber to take over the deliberation and final vote on the Government bill adopting urgent measures to support the agricultural sector due to drought (originating from Royal Decree-Law 4/2022, of March 15).
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 27 of sitting 178· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- Albacete More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 12 yes · 0 no
- Almería More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Badajoz More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 31 yes · 0 no
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Burgos More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Cáceres More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Córdoba More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Cuenca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Girona More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Granada More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Jaén More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- La Rioja More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- León More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Lugo More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 34 yes · 0 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 11 yes · 0 no
- Melilla No count 0 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 10 yes · 0 no
- Navarra More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Ourense More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 12 yes · 0 no
- Soria More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Teruel More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 15 yes · 0 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Mixto, Ciudadanos, Gcup-ec-gc, GPlu, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.
By province: in 51 most voted in favour; in 0, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 51
- Against: 0
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Republicano | 13 | 13 in favour |
| Socialista | 120 | 117 in favour · 3 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 6 | 6 did not vote |
| Mixto | 11 | 7 in favour · 1 abst. · 3 did not vote |
| Ciudadanos | 9 | 9 in favour |
| Gcup-ec-gc | 33 | 31 in favour · 2 did not vote |
| GPlu | 12 | 11 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Popular en el Congreso | 88 | 85 in favour · 3 did not vote |
| VOX | 52 | 51 in favour · 1 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.
It has not been presented again yet.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000096
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 27 of sitting 178
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.