Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill proposes new child pension supplement and pandemic relief

Committee step 4 of 7 · Unfinished

It is a government bill. Introduced by the Government. It was introduced on 18 February 2021. Introduced by: Gobierno.

Official title: Government bill to adopt measures for the reduction of the gender gap and other matters in the fields of Social Security and economics (originating from Royal Decree-Law 3/2021, of February 2).

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000049· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would replace the maternity supplement with a supplement to reduce the gender gap in pensions. Women receiving a pension would get it for each child, and men could also get it if they prove their contribution record was harmed by childcare.
  2. The supplement would be set at 27 euros per month per child for 2021, paid in fourteen installments, and would only remain in force while the gender gap in retirement pensions is above 5%. Those already receiving the maternity supplement would keep it.
  3. The bill would expand access to the minimum vital income: people living in privately funded residential facilities could receive it, the limit on recipients per home would be removed, and special cases such as registration in collective facilities, substandard housing or homelessness would be regulated.
  4. It would create the figure of minimum vital income social mediators: third-sector social action organizations that, for five years, could certify certain situations to speed up access to the benefit.
  5. Retired health professionals who voluntarily return to work during the state of alarm could combine their pension with paid work, and those who catch COVID-19 on the job would receive the same benefits as for an occupational disease.
  6. The bill would extend until March 30, 2021 the deadline to request payment moratoriums on mortgage and non-mortgage debts, with a maximum cumulative duration of nine months. In addition, the Official Credit Institute could obtain credit ratings from the Bank of Spain for guaranteed companies, under a duty of confidentiality.

Who it affects

  • Women pensioners with children, and fathers who prove their career was harmed by childcare: They could receive the new supplement for each child.
  • People in situations of vulnerability or social exclusion: They would have more ways to access the minimum vital income.
  • Self-employed workers taxed under the objective estimation method: It would be easier for them to prove their income dropped to receive the cessation-of-activity benefit.
  • Health and social health care workers: Those rehired after retirement could combine pension and work, and those infected with COVID-19 at work would get occupational disease protection.
  • Families and self-employed people with mortgage or non-mortgage loans: They would have more time to request payment moratoriums, with a nine-month cumulative maximum.

Words worth knowing

Brecha de género (gender gap)
The difference between men and women; here, the difference between the average pension of each.
Ingreso mínimo vital (minimum vital income)
A monthly Social Security payment for people and families with low income.
Moratoria (moratorium)
A temporary deferral or suspension of debt payments.
Estimación objetiva (objective estimation)
A tax method for some self-employed workers who pay based on set modules, not actual revenue.
Enfermedad profesional (occupational disease)
An illness caused by work, which entitles the worker to better Social Security benefits than a common illness.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 4 of 7 steps. It reached Committee, and today it is unfinished.

  1. Introduced18 February 2021Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted23 February 2021The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments26 February 2021Groups propose changes.
  4. Committee16 March 2021A committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 7 official steps on a timeline
Dec 2021Dec 202211. 18 February 2021: Presentación22. 23 February 2021: Comisión de Trabajo, Inclusión, Seguridad Social y Migraciones Publicación desde 23/02/2021 hasta 26/02/202133. 23 February 2021: Calificación44. 26 February 2021: Comisión de Trabajo, Inclusión, Seguridad Social y Migraciones Enmiendas desde 26/02/2021 hasta 30/05/202355. 10 March 2021: Comisión de Trabajo, Inclusión, Seguridad Social y Migraciones Mesa - Calificación desde 10/03/2021 hasta 16/03/202166. 16 March 2021: Comisión de Trabajo, Inclusión, Seguridad Social y Migraciones Debate de totalidad desde 16/03/2021 hasta 25/03/202177. 30 May 2023: Concluido - (Caducado) desde 30/05/2023 hasta 16/06/2023

25 March 2021

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 92 yes · 197 no · 60 abst.

Voted on: Vote on the amendment to the whole of the alternative text to the Government bill adopting measures for the reduction of the gender gap and other matters in the fields of Social Security and the economy (originating from Royal Decree-Law 3/2021, of February 2), presented by the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 10 of sitting 88· updated 11 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Gcup-ec-gc and GPlu. 5 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 3 most voted in favour; in 34, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 3
  • Against: 34
  • Abstained: 1
  • Tie: 14
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu5
5 against
Republicano13
13 against
Socialista120
120 against
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)6
6 against
Mixto10
4 in favour · 6 against
Ciudadanos9
9 abst.
Gcup-ec-gc35
34 against · 1 did not vote
GPlu12
12 against
Popular en el Congreso88
88 in favour
VOX52
1 against · 51 abst.

What happens next

What happens now?

The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.

It has not been presented again yet.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.