Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Streamlining government to manage EU recovery funds

Committee step 4 of 7 · Unfinished

It is a government bill. Introduced by the Government. It was introduced on 4 January 2021. Introduced by: Gobierno.

Official title: Government bill approving urgent measures for the modernization of the Public Administration and for the execution of the Recovery, Transformation and Resilience Plan (originating from Royal Decree-Law 36/2020, of 30 December).

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000043· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would set out management principles for public bodies handling EU funds, including strategic planning, agility, transparency and effective spending control.
  2. It would create a new form of public-private collaboration, the PERTE Proyecto Estratégico para la Recuperación y Transformación Económica: a large strategic public-private collaboration project with spillover effects on the economy., for large strategic projects that boost the economy, declared by the Council of Ministers.
  3. It would create the State Register of entities interested in PERTE projects, under the Ministry of Finance, and would allow registration to be required to receive aid linked to those projects.
  4. It would organize the governance of the Recovery Plan: a Commission chaired by the Prime Minister, a supporting Technical Committee, a Sectoral Conference with the autonomous communities, and social participation forums.
  5. It would relax budget rules: multi-year spending commitments of up to five years, carryover of unused credit, and early processing of spending files for later years.
  6. It would speed up public procurement of projects funded by these funds: urgent processing, shorter deadlines, model contract terms and higher thresholds for simplified procedures.
  7. It would simplify EU-funded grants: some prior authorizations would be removed, grants could be awarded in order of application, and beneficiaries would submit less paperwork.
  8. It would shorten deadlines for environmental assessment procedures and for environmental permits of industrial facilities, to speed up EU-funded projects.

Who it affects

  • Public administrations and their staff: They would follow new management principles and guidelines, prepare strategic plans, and could receive performance-based variable pay.
  • Companies and entities wanting to join PERTE projects: They would need to be accredited and registered in the state register to access aid linked to these projects.
  • Companies contracting with the public sector: Contracts funded by these funds would be processed urgently with shorter deadlines.
  • Entities applying for EU grants: They would face simpler procedures and less documentation to justify.
  • Developers of projects with environmental impact: Their environmental assessments would be decided within shorter time limits.

Words worth knowing

PERTE
Proyecto Estratégico para la Recuperación y Transformación Económica: a large strategic public-private collaboration project with spillover effects on the economy.
Mecanismo de Recuperación y Resiliencia
Recovery and Resilience Facility: an EU fund created to finance the economic recovery of EU countries after the pandemic.
Función interventora
Prior control exercised by the State's audit office to check that public spending is legal and correct before payment.
Convenio administrativo
Administrative agreement: a collaboration deal signed between public administrations or between them and private entities.
Evaluación ambiental
Environmental assessment: a procedure that analyzes the impact of a project or plan on the environment before approval.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 4 of 7 steps. It reached Committee, and today it is unfinished.

  1. Introduced4 January 2021Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted2 February 2021The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments5 February 2021Groups propose changes.
  4. Committee16 February 2021A committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 7 official steps on a timeline
Dec 2021Dec 202211. 4 January 2021: Presentación22. 2 February 2021: Comisión de Asuntos Económicos y Transformación Digital Publicación desde 02/02/2021 hasta 05/02/202133. 2 February 2021: Calificación44. 5 February 2021: Comisión de Asuntos Económicos y Transformación Digital Enmiendas desde 05/02/2021 hasta 30/05/202355. 16 February 2021: Comisión de Asuntos Económicos y Transformación Digital Mesa - Calificación desde 16/02/2021 hasta 16/02/202166. 16 February 2021: Comisión de Asuntos Económicos y Transformación Digital Debate de totalidad desde 16/02/2021 hasta 25/02/202177. 30 May 2023: Concluido - (Caducado) desde 30/05/2023 hasta 16/06/2023

25 February 2021

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 102 yes · 247 no · 1 abst.

Voted on: Vote on the amendment to the whole with alternative text to the Government bill approving urgent measures for the modernization of the Public Administration and for the execution of the Recovery, Transformation and Resilience Plan (Royal Decree-Law 36/2020, of 30 December), submitted by the Ciudadanos Parliamentary Group.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 7 of sitting 79· updated 11 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Ciudadanos and Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Gcup-ec-gc, GPlu and VOX. 5 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 2 most voted in favour; in 44, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 2
  • Against: 44
  • Tie: 6
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu5
5 against
Republicano13
12 against · 1 abst.
Socialista120
120 against
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)6
6 against
Mixto9
4 in favour · 5 against
Ciudadanos10
10 in favour
Gcup-ec-gc35
35 against
GPlu12
12 against
Popular en el Congreso88
88 in favour
VOX52
52 against

What happens next

What happens now?

The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.

It has not been presented again yet.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.