What it is
A monthly payment for households with very low income
It is a government bill. Introduced by the Government. It was introduced on 10 June 2020. Introduced by: Gobierno.
Official title: Government bill to establish the minimum vital income (originating from Royal Decree-Law 20/2020, of 29 May).
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000025· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- It creates the ingreso mínimo vital (minimum vital income): a non-contributory Social Security benefit that guarantees a minimum income level for people living alone or in a cohabitation unit who lack sufficient resources.
- The monthly amount is the difference between the guaranteed income and the household's income. For a person living alone, the guaranteed income equals 100 percent of the annual amount of non-contributory pensions divided by twelve, and it rises with the number of members of the cohabitation unit.
- To qualify, applicants must have residence in Spain (at least one year) and be in a situation of economic vulnerability: income below the guaranteed income and assets below the set limits, excluding the main home.
- The benefit is compatible with income from work or self-employment, within limits and conditions to be set by regulation, so that taking a job is not discouraged.
- It creates a childhood support supplement: a monthly amount for each minor in the cohabitation unit, of 100 euros per month for children under three, 70 euros from three to six, and 50 euros from six to eighteen.
- The right starts on the first day of the month after the application, is paid monthly by bank transfer, and lasts as long as the reasons for the award remain. Beneficiaries must report relevant changes within thirty calendar days.
- Anyone who falsifies data or hides changes to wrongly collect the benefit can be sanctioned with loss of the benefit for up to six months, termination of the right, and a ban on applying again for two or five years, in addition to repaying what was received.
- The law enters into force on January 1, 2022, and applications filed before January 1, 2021 have economic effects retroactive to June 1, 2020 if all requirements were met on that date.
Who it affects
- People living alone with very low income: They can apply from age 23, with exceptions for victims of gender violence Violence a woman suffers from a current or former partner because she is a woman., trafficking, or young people formerly in state care.
- Households of several people related by family or partnership ties: They apply as a cohabitation unit and receive an amount that grows with its members.
- Single-parent families and households with minors: They have specific supplements: the single-parent supplement and the childhood support supplement for each minor.
- People with a recognized disability of 65 percent or more: Their guaranteed income is increased by a 22 percent supplement.
- Companies that hire recipients of the minimum vital income: They may be distinguished with the Social Inclusion Seal (Sello de Inclusión Social).
Words worth knowing
- Prestación no contributiva (non-contributory benefit)
- A Social Security payment received without prior contributions, granted based on need.
- Unidad de convivencia (cohabitation unit)
- A group of people living in the same home, linked by marriage, registered partnership, or kinship up to the second degree.
- Renta garantizada (guaranteed income)
- The maximum amount the minimum vital income can pay; the benefit covers the gap between that amount and the household's actual income.
- Patrimonio neto (net worth)
- The value of the applicant's assets and money, minus debts and excluding the main home.
- Test de activos (asset test)
- A check of the value of bank accounts, properties, and other assets: if it exceeds a set limit, there is no right to the benefit.
- gender violence
- Violence a woman suffers from a current or former partner because she is a woman.
It summarizes the law as published in the BOE. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.
- Introduced10 June 2020Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted16 June 2020The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments19 June 2020Groups propose changes.
- Committee3 June 2021A committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenaryno dateAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senate19 November 2021The Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOE16 December 2021It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 9 official steps on a timeline
16 December 2021
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Government bill establishing the minimum vital income (originating from Real Decreto-ley 20/2020, of May 29). - Block vote on the amendments.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 50 of sitting 141· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Albacete More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 5 yes · 3 no · 4 abst.
- Almería Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Ávila Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Badajoz More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Barcelona More votes in favour 19 yes · 3 no · 6 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Burgos Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Cádiz More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no · 3 abst.
- Cantabria Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Ceuta Tie 0 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Ciudad Real Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Córdoba More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Cuenca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Girona More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Granada More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Guadalajara Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Huelva More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Huesca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Jaén More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- La Rioja Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 5 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- León More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Lleida More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Lugo Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 14 yes · 10 no · 11 abst.
- Málaga More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no · 3 abst.
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no · 2 abst.
- Navarra More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Ourense More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Palencia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Salamanca Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Segovia Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Sevilla More votes in favour 7 yes · 3 no · 2 abst.
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Teruel More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Toledo Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 6 yes · 4 no · 5 abst.
- Valladolid Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Zamora Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista and Gcup-ec-gc. Against, most of Vasco (EAJ-PNV), GPlu and Popular en el Congreso. 11 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 31 most voted in favour; in 4, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 31
- Against: 4
- Abstained: 1
- Tie: 16
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 5 | 4 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Republicano | 13 | 11 in favour · 2 did not vote |
| Socialista | 120 | 116 in favour · 4 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 6 | 5 against · 1 did not vote |
| Mixto | 10 | 3 in favour · 2 against · 4 abst. · 1 did not vote |
| Ciudadanos | 9 | 9 abst. |
| Gcup-ec-gc | 34 | 31 in favour · 3 did not vote |
| GPlu | 12 | 4 in favour · 5 against · 2 abst. · 1 did not vote |
| Popular en el Congreso | 88 | 86 against · 2 did not vote |
| VOX | 52 | 48 abst. · 4 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.
The same initiative in the other chamber:
- XIV Legislature, Senate Government bill to establish the minimum vital income (originating from Royal Decree-Law 20/2020, of 29 May).
Published in the BOE: Law 19/2021, of December 20, establishing the minimum vital income
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000025
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 50 of sitting 141
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- BOE, BOE-A-2021-21007
The law as published.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.