What it is
Court and insolvency measures to deal with the COVID-19 crisis
It is a government bill. Introduced by the Government. It was introduced on 13 May 2020. Introduced by: Gobierno.
Official title: Government bill on procedural and organizational measures to address COVID-19 in the field of the Administration of Justice (originating from Royal Decree-Law 16/2020, of 28 April).
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000018· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- Until June 20, 2021, trials, hearings and other court proceedings will be held preferably by video conference. In criminal cases, however, the defendant must be physically present in trials for serious crimes or when pretrial detention or a prison sentence over two years is requested.
- Public service at courts and prosecutor's offices is provided by video conference, phone or email, and an appointment is needed to go in person. Public access to hearings is limited and wearing robes is waived.
- Procedures arising from the crisis are handled on a priority basis: challenges to temporary layoff plans (ERTEs), dismissals, mortgage and rental moratoriums, denied public aid, and civil registry procedures, among others.
- On insolvency matters, the duty to file for insolvency is postponed until December 31, 2020, and courts will not accept creditor-initiated insolvency petitions filed since March 14, 2020. Debtors may also modify court-approved agreements and refinancing deals.
- Companies do not count their 2020 losses for the purpose of the dissolution ground based on losses, giving them time to restructure their debt and recover.
- A single electronic Judicial Edict Board is created, published by the State Official Gazette Agency, replacing notice boards and official gazettes. Publications and searches will be free and it applies from June 1, 2021.
Who it affects
- Citizens who go to courts or prosecutor's offices: They will be served by video conference, phone or email and need an appointment to go in person.
- Workers and companies with temporary layoff plans (ERTEs) or dismissals: Their cases are handled urgently and on a priority basis.
- Companies and self-employed people in financial trouble: They get more time to avoid insolvency, modify agreements or refinancing deals, and do not count 2020 losses for dissolution.
- Tenants of their main home in financial hardship: They have more time to request a deferral of rent payments and can access temporary financing aid.
- Self-employed workers: They can access their pension plans if their billing drops by at least 75% due to the crisis, without stopping their activity.
Words worth knowing
- Concurso de acreedores (insolvency proceeding)
- Court procedure for when a company or person cannot pay their debts, and their assets are distributed among creditors.
- Expediente de regulación temporal de empleo (ERTE, temporary layoff plan)
- Mechanism allowing a company to temporarily suspend contracts or reduce working hours.
- Convenio concursal (insolvency agreement)
- Agreement between the insolvent company and its creditors to pay debts and avoid liquidation.
- Acuerdo de refinanciación (refinancing agreement)
- Deal between a company and its creditors to restructure debts, for example by deferring payments.
- Edicto (edict)
- Court notice published publicly when a person cannot be notified directly.
It summarizes the law as published in the BOE. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.
- Introduced13 May 2020Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted19 May 2020The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments22 May 2020Groups propose changes.
- Committee30 June 2020A committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenaryno dateAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senate21 July 2020The Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOE16 September 2020It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 9 official steps on a timeline
16 September 2020
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Remaining amendments.
This law had 2 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 5 of sitting 42· updated 11 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Albacete More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 9 yes · 3 no
- Almería More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 6 yes · 1 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 23 yes · 2 no · 6 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Burgos More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Cáceres More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 7 yes · 2 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Córdoba More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Cuenca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Girona More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Granada More votes in favour 6 yes · 1 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 6 yes · 2 no
- Jaén More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- La Rioja More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- León More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Lugo More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 30 yes · 7 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 9 yes · 2 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 7 yes · 3 no
- Navarra More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Ourense More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 6 yes · 1 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 10 yes · 2 no
- Soria More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Teruel More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Toledo More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 12 yes · 3 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 6 yes · 1 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Ciudadanos, Gcup-ec-gc and Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of VOX. 4 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 51 most voted in favour; in 1, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 51
- Against: 1
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 5 | 3 in favour · 1 abst. · 1 did not vote |
| Republicano | 13 | 13 in favour |
| Socialista | 120 | 120 in favour |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 6 | 6 in favour |
| Mixto | 9 | 4 in favour · 4 abst. · 1 did not vote |
| Ciudadanos | 10 | 10 in favour |
| Gcup-ec-gc | 35 | 33 in favour · 2 did not vote |
| GPlu | 12 | 3 in favour · 9 abst. |
| Popular en el Congreso | 88 | 88 in favour |
| VOX | 52 | 52 against |
What happens next
What happens now?
It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.
The same initiative in the other chamber:
- XIV Legislature, Senate Government bill on procedural and organizational measures to address COVID-19 in the field of the Administration of Justice (originating from Royal Decree-Law 16/2020, of 28 April).
Published in the BOE: Law 3/2020, of September 18, on procedural and organizational measures to address COVID-19 in the field of the Administration of Justice.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000018
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 5 of sitting 42
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- BOE, BOE-A-2020-10923
The law as published.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.