What it is
Rules for electronic trust services and digital signatures in Spain
BOE step 7 of 7 · PassedIt is a government bill. Introduced by the Government. It was introduced on 19 February 2020. Introduced by: Gobierno.
Official title: Government bill regulating certain aspects of electronic trust services.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000004· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The law adapts Spanish rules to the EU Regulation on electronic identification and trust services. It does not repeat what the Regulation already covers; it only fills in the parts left to each Member State, such as the penalty system and identity checks for certificate applicants.
- Qualified certificates last at most five years and end through expiration or revocation. The law lists the cases of revocation and suspension, such as a breach of signature data, a court order, or the signer's death.
- Qualified certificates for individuals must include their name and their national ID, foreigner ID, or tax number. To request one, applicants generally must appear in person before the verifier, though remote identification by video call is allowed if it offers equivalent security.
- Qualified trust service providers must carry civil liability insurance of €1,500,000, plus €500,000 for each additional qualified service, and keep service records for 15 years. If they plan to stop operating, they must notify clients and the supervisor at least two months in advance.
- Non-qualified providers need no prior verification, but must notify the Ministry within three months of starting. Qualified providers do go through prior verification and must submit a conformity assessment report at least every 24 months.
- Offenses are classified as minor, serious, and very serious, with fines of up to €300,000. The law repeals the 2003 electronic signature law and Article 25 of the information society services law.
Who it affects
- Public and private trust service providers established in Spain: They must meet security, insurance, reporting, and supervision obligations, with penalties if they fail.
- Individuals and companies requesting electronic certificates: They must prove their identity, and their details will appear on the certificate.
- Companies providing services to the public with special economic importance: They must offer users a secure electronic communication channel, not necessarily based on certificates.
- Public administrations: Their identification, signature, and electronic seal systems have full legal effect.
Words worth knowing
- Servicio electrónico de confianza (electronic trust service)
- A service that helps identify someone or guarantee documents online, such as electronic signatures or time stamping.
- Certificado cualificado (qualified certificate)
- An electronic certificate meeting high security requirements, with special evidential value.
- Prestador de servicios de confianza (trust service provider)
- A company or body that issues certificates and provides these electronic services.
- Lista de confianza (trust list)
- A public list of qualified providers allowed to offer their services.
- Sello electrónico (electronic seal)
- The equivalent of an electronic signature, but for companies and entities, not individuals.
It summarizes the law as published in the BOE. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.
- Introduced19 February 2020Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted25 February 2020The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments28 February 2020Groups propose changes.
- Committee18 April 2020A committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenaryno dateAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senate20 July 2020The Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOE29 October 2020It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 9 official steps on a timeline
29 October 2020
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Government bill regulating certain aspects of electronic trust services. The Senate amendments are voted on jointly.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 19 of sitting 56· updated 11 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- Albacete More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 12 yes · 0 no
- Almería More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Asturias More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Badajoz More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 19 yes · 4 no · 7 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Burgos More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Cáceres More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 9 yes · 0 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Córdoba More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Cuenca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Girona Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- Granada More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- Jaén More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- La Rioja More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- León More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Lleida Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Lugo More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 37 yes · 0 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 11 yes · 0 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 10 yes · 0 no
- Navarra More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Ourense More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Segovia More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 11 yes · 1 no
- Soria More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Teruel More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 15 yes · 0 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Ciudadanos, Gcup-ec-gc, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of GPlu. 6 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 50 most voted in favour; in 0, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 50
- Against: 0
- Abstained: 1
- Tie: 1
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 5 | 5 abst. |
| Republicano | 13 | 13 abst. |
| Socialista | 120 | 120 in favour |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 6 | 6 in favour |
| Mixto | 9 | 6 in favour · 1 abst. · 2 did not vote |
| Ciudadanos | 10 | 10 in favour |
| Gcup-ec-gc | 35 | 35 in favour |
| GPlu | 12 | 4 in favour · 8 against |
| Popular en el Congreso | 88 | 87 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| VOX | 52 | 51 in favour · 1 against |
What happens next
What happens now?
It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.
The same initiative in the other chamber:
- XIV Legislature, Senate Government bill regulating certain aspects of electronic trust services.
Published in the BOE: Law 6/2020, of November 11, regulating certain aspects of electronic trust services.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000004
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 19 of sitting 56
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- BOE, BOE-A-2020-14046
The law as published.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.