What it is

Non-legislative motion on the harmonization of contents and fees to be paid in the EBAU (Baccalaureate Evaluation for Access to University) exams.

Plenary step 5 of 7 · Rejected

It is a non-binding motion. It was introduced on 6 June 2019. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Ciudadanos.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 162/000003· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 5 of 7 steps. It reached Plenary, and today it is rejected.

Introduced6 June 2019Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
Admitted11 June 2019The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
Plenary14 June 2019All 350 deputies vote.
Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.

See the 5 official steps on a timeline

10 September 2019

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 125 yes · 211 no

Voted on: Non-legislative motion by the Ciudadanos Parliamentary Group, on the harmonization of contents and fees to be paid in the EBAU (Baccalaureate Evaluation for Access to University) exams. Voted on in the terms of the compromise amendment submitted by the Popular Parliamentary Group and the Ciudadanos Parliamentary Group.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 4 of sitting 6· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted

More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Ciudadanos and Popular. Against, most of Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Gcup-ec-gc and VOX. 3 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 9 most voted in favour; in 32, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

In favour: 9
Against: 32
Tie: 11

Result by parliamentary group
Group	Seats	How it voted
Republicano	14	1 in favour · 13 against
Socialista	123	121 against · 2 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)	6	6 against
Mixto	18	2 in favour · 9 against · 7 did not vote
Ciudadanos	56	56 in favour
Gcup-ec-gc	42	38 against · 4 did not vote
Popular	66	66 in favour
VOX	24	24 against

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

Congreso de los Diputados, file 162/000003
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.

Retrieved 11 November 2026
Congreso de los Diputados, vote 4 of sitting 6
The count and every seat’s vote.

Retrieved 10 November 2026

The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
We never say “passed” because of a vote: the files do not say which majority was needed.

Read the full method · Report an error

Non-legislative motion on the harmonization of contents and fees to be paid in the EBAU (Baccalaureate Evaluation for Access to University) exams. Automatic translation · See the Spanish original