Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Proposal to reform Organic Law 4/1982, of 9 June, on the Statute of Autonomy of the Region of Murcia (corresponding to file number 127/000003/0000 of the XII Legislature).

Plenary step 5 of 7 · Unfinished

It is a reform of a regional statute. Changes a region’s statute of autonomy. It was introduced on 21 May 2019. Introduced by: Comunidad Autónoma de la Región de Murcia - Asamblea Regional.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 127/000001· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 5 of 7 steps. It reached Plenary, and today it is unfinished.

  1. Introduced21 May 2019Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted5 June 2019The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments20 September 2019Groups propose changes.
  4. Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary10 June 2019All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 8 official steps on a timeline
May 2019Jun 2019Jul 2019Aug 201911. 21 May 2019: Presentación22. 5 June 2019: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 05/06/2019 hasta 10/06/201933. 5 June 2019: Calificación44. 10 June 2019: Pleno Debate de totalidad desde 10/06/2019 hasta 10/09/201955. 10 September 2019: Mesa del Congreso Acuerdo subsiguiente a votación favorable en debate totalidad desde 10/09/2019 hasta 17/09/201966. 17 September 2019: Comisión Constitucional Publicación desde 17/09/2019 hasta 20/09/201977. 20 September 2019: Comisión Constitucional Enmiendas desde 20/09/2019 hasta 24/09/201988. 24 September 2019: Concluido - (Trasladado al próximo Congreso) desde 24/09/2019 hasta 23/10/2019

10 September 2019

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 293 yes · 0 no · 21 abst.

Voted on: Proposal to reform Organic Law 4/1982, of 9 June, on the Statute of Autonomy of the Region of Murcia (corresponding to file number 127/000003/0000 of the XII Legislature).

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 6· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Ciudadanos, Gcup-ec-gc, Popular and VOX. 3 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 50 most voted in favour; in 0, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 50
  • Against: 0
  • Abstained: 2
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Republicano14
14 abst.
Socialista123
120 in favour · 3 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)6
6 in favour
Mixto18
4 in favour · 4 abst. · 10 did not vote
Ciudadanos56
55 in favour · 1 did not vote
Gcup-ec-gc42
38 in favour · 4 did not vote
Popular66
66 in favour
VOX24
4 in favour · 3 abst. · 17 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.

It has not been presented again yet.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.