What it is
Bill proposes a special pay supplement for judges and prosecutors in Catalonia
Admitted step 2 of 7 · UnfinishedIt is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 6 June 2019. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular.
Official title: Private member's bill amending Law 15/2003, of May 26, regulating the remuneration regime of the judicial and fiscal careers for the destination supplement in special circumstances.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000005· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would create a special salary supplement for judges and magistrates serving in Catalonia, due to disturbances that make their work harder there. The amount would be the same that judges serving in the Basque Country and Navarre already receive, with no retroactive effect, and it would be updated each year under Law 15/2003.
- It would also establish the same special supplement for members of the prosecutorial career serving in Catalonia, in the same amount received by prosecutors in the Basque Country and Navarre, with no retroactive effect and with annual updates.
- The Government would have to review each year, with a prior report from the General Council of the Judiciary, whether to keep, raise, or withdraw these measures, and send its report to the Congress of Deputies within fifteen days.
- The bill justifies the measure by the departure of judges and magistrates from Catalonia: 21 transferred out in 2017 and about 48 in 2018, according to the report of the High Court of Justice of Catalonia.
Who it affects
- Judges and magistrates serving in Catalonia: They would receive a special monthly pay supplement of €498.70 (a 2007 figure, subject to updates).
- Prosecutors serving in Catalonia: They would receive the same special supplement of €498.70 per month (a 2007 figure, subject to updates).
- The Government: It would have to review the measures yearly and could change them by royal decree.
Words worth knowing
- Complemento de destino
- A supplement added to a public employee's salary depending on their position or workplace.
- Carrera judicial y fiscal
- The body of judges and magistrates (carrera judicial) and prosecutors (carrera fiscal).
- Consejo General del Poder Judicial
- The body that governs judges in Spain (General Council of the Judiciary).
- Real decreto
- A rule approved by the Government and signed by the King (royal decree).
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is unfinished.
- Introduced6 June 2019Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted11 June 2019The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
Was there a plenary vote?
We have no plenary vote linked to this law in the Congreso’s data.
What happens next
What happens now?
The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.
It has not been presented again yet.
Presented before in:
- XII Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Unfinished Bill proposes special pay supplement for judges and prosecutors in Catalonia
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000005
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.