Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Government Agreement setting the budgetary stability and public debt objectives for the Public Administrations as a whole and for each of their subsectors for the period 2017-2019, and the non-financial expenditure limit of the State Budget for 2017.

BOE step 7 of 7 · Passed

Type of initiative: objetivo de estabilidad presupuestaria. It was introduced on 2 December 2016. Introduced by: Gobierno.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 430/000002· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.

  1. Introduced2 December 2016Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted7 December 2016The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary12 December 2016All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senate15 December 2016The Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOE20 December 2016It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 7 official steps on a timeline
Dec 2016Dec 2016Dec 2016Dec 2016Dec 201611. 2 December 2016: Presentación22. 7 December 2016: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 07/12/2016 hasta 12/12/201633. 7 December 2016: Calificación44. 7 December 2016: Mesa del Congreso Calificación por Mesa sin reunión desde 07/12/2016 hasta 07/12/201655. 12 December 2016: Pleno Aprobación desde 12/12/2016 hasta 15/12/201666. 15 December 2016: Senado desde 15/12/2016 hasta 20/12/201677. 20 December 2016: Concluido - (Aprobado sin modificaciones) desde 20/12/2016 hasta 27/12/2016

15 December 2016

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 251 yes · 87 no · 1 abst.

Voted on: Government Agreement setting the budgetary stability and public debt objectives for the whole of Public Administrations and each of their subsectors for the period 2017-2019 and the non-financial expenditure limit of the State Budget for 2017. Voted on the Budgetary Stability and Public Debt Objectives proposed by the Government.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 8 of sitting 21· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Ciudadanos and Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Mixto, Gcup-ec-em and GER. 4 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 45 most voted in favour; in 3, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 45
  • Against: 3
  • Tie: 4
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista84
83 in favour · 1 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 in favour
Mixto19
3 in favour · 14 against · 1 abst. · 1 did not vote
Ciudadanos32
31 in favour · 1 did not vote
Gcup-ec-em67
66 against · 1 did not vote
GER9
7 against · 2 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso134
129 in favour · 5 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We never say “passed” because of a vote: the files do not say which majority was needed.