What it is
Motion following an urgent interpellation on the geotechnical and safety problems in the raising of the Yesa dam and the prospects for transparency and social dialogue.
Admitted step 2 of 7 · RejectedType of initiative: . It was introduced on 28 June 2018. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Confederal de Unidos Podemos-En Comú Podem-En Marea.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 173/000099· updated 11 Nov
We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced28 June 2018Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted10 July 2018The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 2 official steps on a timeline
11 September 2018
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Rest of the Motion.
This law had 2 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 7 of sitting 138· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 2 yes · 6 no
- Albacete More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 3 yes · 9 no
- Almería More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Araba/Álava Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Asturias More votes against 2 yes · 6 no
- Ávila More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Badajoz More votes against 1 yes · 5 no
- Barcelona More votes against 8 yes · 13 no
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 6 yes · 2 no
- Burgos More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Cáceres More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Cádiz More votes against 2 yes · 7 no
- Cantabria More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Córdoba More votes against 1 yes · 5 no
- Cuenca More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Girona More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Granada More votes against 1 yes · 6 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Huelva More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 2 yes · 6 no
- Jaén More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- La Rioja More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 2 yes · 6 no
- León More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Lleida Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Lugo More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Madrid More votes against 5 yes · 29 no
- Málaga More votes against 2 yes · 9 no
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 1 yes · 9 no
- Navarra More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ourense More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Palencia More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 2 yes · 5 no
- Salamanca More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 1 yes · 5 no · 1 abst.
- Segovia More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Sevilla More votes against 1 yes · 9 no
- Soria More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Tarragona More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Teruel More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Toledo More votes against 1 yes · 5 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 4 yes · 11 no
- Valladolid More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Zamora More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 1 yes · 5 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto and Gcup-ec-em. Against, most of Socialista, Ciudadanos and Popular en el Congreso. 6 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 2 most voted in favour; in 48, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 2
- Against: 48
- Tie: 2
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 84 | 84 against |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Mixto | 19 | 6 in favour · 4 against · 1 abst. · 8 did not vote |
| Ciudadanos | 32 | 30 against · 2 did not vote |
| Gcup-ec-em | 67 | 58 in favour · 1 against · 8 did not vote |
| GER | 9 | 9 did not vote |
| Popular en el Congreso | 134 | 133 against · 1 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 173/000099
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 7 of sitting 138
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.