Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Motion following an urgent interpellation on the abuse by the Government of appeals of unconstitutionality to regional laws and the automatic suspension of regional provisions and rules provided for in Article 161.2 of the Constitution.

Plenary step 5 of 7 · Rejected

It is a motion. It was introduced on 27 September 2017. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Mixto.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 173/000047· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 5 of 7 steps. It reached Plenary, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced27 September 2017Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted10 October 2017The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary10 October 2017All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 4 official steps on a timeline
Sept 201711. 27 September 2017: Presentación22. 10 October 2017: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 10/10/2017 hasta 19/10/201733. 10 October 2017: Calificación44. 10 October 2017: Pleno Contestación desde 10/10/2017 hasta 10/10/2017

10 October 2017

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 157 yes · 161 no · 2 abst.

Voted on: Motion following an urgent interpellation by the Mixed Parliamentary Group (Mr. Baldoví, Mr. Candela and Mr. Bataller and Ms. Sorlí), on the abuse by the Government of appeals of unconstitutionality against regional laws and the automatic suspension of regional provisions and rules provided for in Article 161.2 of the Constitution.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 6 of sitting 76· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto and Gcup-ec-em. Against, most of Ciudadanos and Popular en el Congreso. 5 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 11 most voted in favour; in 22, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 11
  • Against: 22
  • Tie: 19
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista84
82 in favour · 2 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 in favour
Mixto19
6 in favour · 3 against · 2 abst. · 8 did not vote
Ciudadanos32
31 against · 1 did not vote
Gcup-ec-em67
64 in favour · 3 did not vote
GER9
9 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso134
127 against · 7 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.