What it is

Motion following an urgent interpellation on the privatization of public and health services and its effects on the sustainability of the healthcare system and on the health of the population.

Plenary step 5 of 7 · Rejected

It is a motion. It was introduced on 11 May 2017. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Confederal de Unidos Podemos-En Comú Podem-En Marea.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 173/000030· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 5 of 7 steps. It reached Plenary, and today it is rejected.

Introduced11 May 2017Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
Admitted16 May 2017The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
Plenary16 May 2017All 350 deputies vote.
Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.

See the 4 official steps on a timeline

18 May 2017

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 165 yes · 177 no

Voted on: Motion following an urgent interpellation by the Confederal Parliamentary Group of Unidos Podemos-En Comú Podem-En Marea, regarding the privatization of public and health services and its effects on the sustainability of the health system and on the health of the population. It is voted on in the terms resulting from the incorporation of the amendment by the Socialist Parliamentary Group.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 53· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted

More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, Gcup-ec-em and GER. Against, most of Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Ciudadanos and Popular en el Congreso. 7 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 10 most voted in favour; in 21, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

In favour: 10
Against: 21
Tie: 21

Result by parliamentary group
Group	Seats	How it voted
Socialista	84	83 in favour · 1 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)	5	5 against
Mixto	19	7 in favour · 10 against · 2 did not vote
Ciudadanos	32	32 against
Gcup-ec-em	67	66 in favour · 1 did not vote
GER	9	9 in favour
Popular en el Congreso	134	130 against · 4 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

Congreso de los Diputados, file 173/000030
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.

Retrieved 11 November 2026
Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 53
The count and every seat’s vote.

Retrieved 10 November 2026

The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.

Read the full method · Report an error

Motion following an urgent interpellation on the privatization of public and health services and its effects on the sustainability of the healthcare system and on the health of the population. Automatic translation · See the Spanish original