Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.
Sign in

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Motion following an urgent interpellation on the political responsibilities the Minister of Justice intends to assume as a result of the maneuvers that have taken place within the Public Prosecutor's Office aimed at obstructing certain judicial proceedings against corruption and of the Minister's own actions regarding these proceedings.

BOE step 7 of 7 · Passed

It is a motion. It was introduced on 11 May 2017. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Socialista.

Follow

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 173/000029· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.

  1. Introduced11 May 2017Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted16 May 2017The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary16 May 2017All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senateno dateThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOE16 May 2017It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 4 official steps on a timeline
May 201711. 11 May 2017: Presentación22. 16 May 2017: Calificación33. 16 May 2017: Pleno desde 16/05/2017 hasta 16/05/201744. 16 May 2017: Concluido - (Aprobado sin modificaciones) desde 16/05/2017 hasta 24/05/2017

16 May 2017

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 207 yes · 134 no

Voted on: Motion following an urgent interpellation by the Socialist Parliamentary Group, regarding the political responsibilities that the Minister of Justice intends to assume as a consequence of the maneuvers that have taken place within the Public Prosecutor's Office aimed at obstructing certain judicial proceedings against corruption and of the Minister's own actions in relation to these proceedings.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 5 of sitting 51· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Ciudadanos, Gcup-ec-em and GER. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso. 3 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 27 most voted in favour; in 12, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 27
  • Against: 12
  • Tie: 13
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista84
83 in favour · 1 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 in favour
Mixto19
14 in favour · 3 against · 2 did not vote
Ciudadanos32
32 in favour
Gcup-ec-em67
64 in favour · 3 did not vote
GER9
9 in favour
Popular en el Congreso134
131 against · 3 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.

Read the full method · Report an error