Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Motion following an urgent interpellation on the Government's policy on the fight against fraud and tax evasion and, more specifically, on the measures adopted to ensure that taxpayers benefiting from the 2012 tax regularization, better known as the 'tax amnesty', effectively pay the 10% rate expressly provided for in the Law.

BOE step 7 of 7 · Passed

It is a motion. It was introduced on 24 November 2016. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Ciudadanos.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 173/000003· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.

  1. Introduced24 November 2016Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted29 November 2016The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary29 November 2016All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senateno dateThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOE29 November 2016It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 4 official steps on a timeline
Nov 201611. 24 November 2016: Presentación22. 29 November 2016: Calificación33. 29 November 2016: Pleno desde 29/11/2016 hasta 29/11/201644. 29 November 2016: Concluido - (Aprobado con modificaciones) desde 29/11/2016 hasta 13/12/2016

29 November 2016

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 200 yes · 0 no · 132 abst.

Voted on: Motion following an urgent interpellation by the Ciudadanos Parliamentary Group, on the Government's policy regarding the fight against fraud and tax evasion and, more specifically, on the measures adopted to ensure that taxpayers benefiting from the 2012 tax regularization, more commonly known as the "tax amnesty," effectively pay the 10% rate expressly provided for in the Law. To be voted on in the terms resulting from the incorporation of amendments by the Confederal Parliamentary Group of Unidos Podemos-En Comú Podem-En Marea to point 6 and the addition of point 7.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 11 of sitting 17· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Ciudadanos, Gcup-ec-em and GER. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.

By province: in 27 most voted in favour; in 0, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 27
  • Against: 0
  • Abstained: 14
  • Tie: 11
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista84
82 in favour · 2 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)4
4 in favour
Mixto19
15 in favour · 1 abst. · 3 did not vote
Ciudadanos32
32 in favour
Gcup-ec-em67
61 in favour · 6 did not vote
GER9
6 in favour · 3 did not vote
Sin grupo4
4 abst.
Popular en el Congreso130
127 abst. · 3 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.