What it is

Non-legislative motion regarding sufficient funding for the Agreed Plan for Basic Social Services Benefits via the General State Budgets for the proper exercise of the right.

BOE step 7 of 7 · Passed

It is a non-binding motion. It was introduced on 24 October 2018. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Confederal de Unidos Podemos-En Comú Podem-En Marea.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 162/000836· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.

Introduced24 October 2018Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
Admitted30 October 2018The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
Plenary5 November 2018All 350 deputies vote.
Senateno dateThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
BOE13 November 2018It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.

See the 5 official steps on a timeline

13 November 2018

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 173 yes · 161 no · 4 abst.

Voted on: Non-legislative motion from the Confederal Parliamentary Group of Unidos Podemos-En Comú Podem-En Marea, regarding adequate funding of the Concerted Plan for Basic Social Services Benefits through the General State Budgets for the proper exercise of the right.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 3 of sitting 156· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted

More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, Mixto, Gcup-ec-em and GER. Against, most of Ciudadanos and Popular en el Congreso. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 16 most voted in favour; in 20, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

In favour: 16
Against: 20
Tie: 15

Result by parliamentary group
Group	Seats	How it voted
Socialista	84	83 in favour · 1 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)	5	4 abst. · 1 did not vote
Mixto	19	15 in favour · 2 against · 2 did not vote
Ciudadanos	32	29 against · 3 did not vote
Gcup-ec-em	67	66 in favour · 1 did not vote
GER	9	9 in favour
Popular en el Congreso	134	130 against · 4 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

Congreso de los Diputados, file 162/000836
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.

Retrieved 11 November 2026
Congreso de los Diputados, vote 3 of sitting 156
The count and every seat’s vote.

Retrieved 10 November 2026

The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.

Read the full method · Report an error

Non-legislative motion regarding sufficient funding for the Agreed Plan for Basic Social Services Benefits via the General State Budgets for the proper exercise of the right. Automatic translation · See the Spanish original