Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.
Sign in

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Non-legislative motion on the increase of the age for marriage.

Plenary step 5 of 7 · Rejected

It is a non-binding motion. It was introduced on 23 February 2018. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso.

Follow

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 162/000611· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 5 of 7 steps. It reached Plenary, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced23 February 2018Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted27 February 2018The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary2 March 2018All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 5 official steps on a timeline
Feb 2018Mar 2018Mar 2018Mar 2018Mar 201811. 23 February 2018: Presentación22. 27 February 2018: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 27/02/2018 hasta 02/03/201833. 27 February 2018: Calificación44. 2 March 2018: Pleno desde 02/03/2018 hasta 20/03/201855. 20 March 2018: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 20/03/2018 hasta 02/04/2018

20 March 2018

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 130 yes · 203 no · 3 abst.

Voted on: Non-legislative motion by the Popular in the Congress Parliamentary Group, regarding the increase of the age for contracting marriage.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 3 of sitting 106· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Ciudadanos, Gcup-ec-em and GER. 6 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 13 most voted in favour; in 24, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 13
  • Against: 24
  • Tie: 15
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista84
80 against · 4 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 against
Mixto19
3 in favour · 12 against · 3 abst. · 1 did not vote
Ciudadanos32
32 against
Gcup-ec-em67
65 against · 2 did not vote
GER9
9 against
Popular en el Congreso134
127 in favour · 7 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.

Read the full method · Report an error