Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.
Sign in

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Non-legislative motion on the willingness to investigate the attacks perpetrated in Barcelona and Cambrils in August 2017.

Plenary step 5 of 7 · Rejected

It is a non-binding motion. It was introduced on 25 January 2018. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Ciudadanos.

Follow

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 162/000574· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 5 of 7 steps. It reached Plenary, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced25 January 2018Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted30 January 2018The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary2 February 2018All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 5 official steps on a timeline
Jan 2018Feb 2018Feb 2018Feb 201811. 25 January 2018: Presentación22. 30 January 2018: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 30/01/2018 hasta 02/02/201833. 30 January 2018: Calificación44. 2 February 2018: Pleno desde 02/02/2018 hasta 13/02/201855. 13 February 2018: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 13/02/2018 hasta 21/02/2018

13 February 2018

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 30 yes · 238 no · 73 abst.

Voted on: Non-legislative motion by the Ciudadanos Parliamentary Group, on the will to investigate the attacks perpetrated in Barcelona and Cambrils in August 2017.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 4 of sitting 97· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Ciudadanos. Against, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GER and Popular en el Congreso. 9 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 0 most voted in favour; in 49, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 0
  • Against: 49
  • Tie: 3
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista84
82 against · 2 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 against
Mixto19
12 against · 6 abst. · 1 did not vote
Ciudadanos32
30 in favour · 1 against · 1 did not vote
Gcup-ec-em67
1 against · 66 abst.
GER9
8 against · 1 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso134
129 against · 1 abst. · 4 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.

Read the full method · Report an error