Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.
Sign in

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Non-legislative motion to create a public banking hub.

Plenary step 5 of 7 · Rejected

It is a non-binding motion. It was introduced on 18 December 2017. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Confederal de Unidos Podemos-En Comú Podem-En Marea.

Follow

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 162/000548· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 5 of 7 steps. It reached Plenary, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced18 December 2017Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted9 January 2018The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary12 January 2018All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 5 official steps on a timeline
Dec 2017Mar 2018Jun 2018Sept 201811. 18 December 2017: Presentación22. 9 January 2018: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 09/01/2018 hasta 12/01/201833. 9 January 2018: Calificación44. 12 January 2018: Pleno desde 12/01/2018 hasta 16/10/201855. 16 October 2018: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 16/10/2018 hasta 25/10/2018

16 October 2018

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 79 yes · 179 no · 86 abst.

Voted on: Non-legislative motion by the Confederal Parliamentary Group of Unidos Podemos-En Comú Podem-En Marea, regarding the creation of a public banking pole.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 5 of sitting 148· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Gcup-ec-em and GER. Against, most of Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Ciudadanos and Popular en el Congreso. 8 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 5 most voted in favour; in 40, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 5
  • Against: 40
  • Tie: 7
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista84
84 abst.
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 against
Mixto19
6 in favour · 10 against · 1 abst. · 2 did not vote
Ciudadanos32
30 against · 2 did not vote
Gcup-ec-em67
64 in favour · 1 abst. · 2 did not vote
GER9
9 in favour
Popular en el Congreso134
134 against

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.

Read the full method · Report an error