What it is
Non-legislative motion on the quality and the reduction of waiting times to receive the benefits regulated by Law 39/2006, of December 14, on the Promotion of Personal Autonomy and Care for People in a Situation of Dependence.
BOE step 7 of 7 · PassedIt is a non-binding motion. It was introduced on 24 October 2017. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Confederal de Unidos Podemos-En Comú Podem-En Marea.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 162/000484· updated 11 Nov
We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.
- Introduced24 October 2017Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted6 November 2017The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
- Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenary10 November 2017All 350 deputies vote.
- Senateno dateThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOE14 November 2017It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 5 official steps on a timeline
14 November 2017
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Non-legislative motion of the Confederal Parliamentary Group of Unidos Podemos-En Comú Podem-En Marea, regarding the quality and the reduction of waiting times to receive the benefits regulated by Act 39/2006, of 14 December, on the Promotion of Personal Autonomy and Care for People in a Situation of Dependence. Voted in the terms of the transitory amendment submitted by the Confederal Parliamentary Group of Unidos Podemos-En Comú Podem-En Marea, the Ciudadanos Parliamentary Group and the Mixed Parliamentary Group.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 4 of sitting 85· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Albacete Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 7 yes · 5 no
- Almería Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 5 yes · 3 no
- Ávila More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Badajoz Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 25 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 6 yes · 1 no
- Burgos Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 6 yes · 3 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Córdoba More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Cuenca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Girona More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Granada More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 5 yes · 3 no
- Jaén More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- La Rioja Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 5 yes · 3 no
- León Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Lugo Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 19 yes · 11 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 6 yes · 4 no
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia Tie 5 yes · 5 no
- Navarra More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Ourense More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Palencia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Salamanca More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Segovia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 7 yes · 4 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Teruel More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Toledo Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 9 yes · 6 no
- Valladolid Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Zamora More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Ciudadanos, Gcup-ec-em and GER. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 27 most voted in favour; in 12, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 27
- Against: 12
- Tie: 13
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 84 | 81 in favour · 3 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 4 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Mixto | 19 | 18 in favour · 1 against |
| Ciudadanos | 32 | 30 in favour · 2 did not vote |
| Gcup-ec-em | 67 | 62 in favour · 5 did not vote |
| GER | 9 | 9 in favour |
| Popular en el Congreso | 134 | 127 against · 1 abst. · 6 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 162/000484
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 4 of sitting 85
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.