What it is

Non-legislative motion on the standardization of Agricultural Income and Agricultural Subsidy in a more agile special agricultural system that eliminates discrimination and guarantees the rights of rural workers.

Plenary step 5 of 7 · Rejected

It is a non-binding motion. It was introduced on 23 March 2017. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Confederal de Unidos Podemos-En Comú Podem-En Marea.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 162/000381· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 5 of 7 steps. It reached Plenary, and today it is rejected.

Introduced23 March 2017Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
Admitted28 March 2017The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
Plenary31 March 2017All 350 deputies vote.
Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.

See the 5 official steps on a timeline

16 May 2017

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 78 yes · 172 no · 91 abst.

Voted on: Non-legislative motion by the Confederal Parliamentary Group of Unidos Podemos-En Comú Podem-En Marea, regarding the homologation of Agricultural Income and the Agricultural Subsidy in a more agile special agricultural system that eliminates discriminations and guarantees the rights of workers in the rural area.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 4 of sitting 51· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted

More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Gcup-ec-em and GER. Against, most of Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Ciudadanos and Popular en el Congreso. 9 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 3 most voted in favour; in 40, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

In favour: 3
Against: 40
Tie: 9

Result by parliamentary group
Group	Seats	How it voted
Socialista	84	83 abst. · 1 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)	5	5 against
Mixto	19	5 in favour · 4 against · 8 abst. · 2 did not vote
Ciudadanos	32	32 against
Gcup-ec-em	67	64 in favour · 3 did not vote
GER	9	9 in favour
Popular en el Congreso	134	131 against · 3 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

Congreso de los Diputados, file 162/000381
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.

Retrieved 11 November 2026
Congreso de los Diputados, vote 4 of sitting 51
The count and every seat’s vote.

Retrieved 10 November 2026

The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.

Read the full method · Report an error

Non-legislative motion on the standardization of Agricultural Income and Agricultural Subsidy in a more agile special agricultural system that eliminates discrimination and guarantees the rights of rural workers. Automatic translation · See the Spanish original