Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Non-legislative motion on the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA).

Plenary step 5 of 7 · Rejected

It is a non-binding motion. It was introduced on 28 October 2016. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Confederal de Unidos Podemos-En Comú Podem-En Marea.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 162/000219· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 5 of 7 steps. It reached Plenary, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced28 October 2016Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted8 November 2016The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary11 November 2016All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 5 official steps on a timeline
Oct 2016Nov 2016Nov 2016Nov 2016Nov 201611. 28 October 2016: Presentación22. 8 November 2016: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 08/11/2016 hasta 11/11/201633. 8 November 2016: Calificación44. 11 November 2016: Pleno desde 11/11/2016 hasta 29/11/201655. 29 November 2016: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 29/11/2016 hasta 13/12/2016

29 November 2016

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 73 yes · 260 no

Voted on: Non-legislative motion by the Confederal Parliamentary Group of Unidos Podemos-En Comú Podem-En Marea, on the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA). To be voted on in the terms resulting from the incorporation of the amendment by the Confederal Parliamentary Group of Unidos Podemos - En Comú Podem - En Marea.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 4 of sitting 17· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Gcup-ec-em and GER. Against, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Ciudadanos, Sin grupo and Popular en el Congreso. 6 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 2 most voted in favour; in 48, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 2
  • Against: 48
  • Tie: 2
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista84
83 against · 1 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)4
4 against
Mixto19
6 in favour · 10 against · 3 did not vote
Ciudadanos32
32 against
Gcup-ec-em67
61 in favour · 6 did not vote
GER9
6 in favour · 3 did not vote
Sin grupo4
4 against
Popular en el Congreso130
127 against · 3 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.