Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.
Sign in

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Request for the creation of an Investigation Commission on the causes of the railway accident that occurred in Santiago on July 24, 2013.

BOE step 7 of 7 · Passed

It is a request to create a committee of inquiry. It was introduced on 19 July 2017. Introduced by: Robles Fernández, Margarita (GS) y 77 Diputados.

Follow

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 156/000020· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.

  1. Introduced19 July 2017Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted12 September 2017The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary19 September 2017All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senateno dateThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOE28 September 2017It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 5 official steps on a timeline
Jul 2017Aug 201711. 19 July 2017: Presentación22. 12 September 2017: Junta de Portavoces desde 12/09/2017 hasta 19/09/201733. 12 September 2017: Calificación44. 19 September 2017: Pleno desde 19/09/2017 hasta 28/09/201755. 28 September 2017: Concluido - (Aprobado con modificaciones) desde 28/09/2017 hasta 10/10/2018

28 September 2017

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 208 yes · 135 no

Voted on: Request made by 78 Deputies of the Socialist Parliamentary Group, for the creation of an Inquiry Committee on the causes of the railway accident that occurred in Santiago on 24 July 2013. It is voted on jointly with request file number 156/21, in the terms of the transitory proposal submitted by the Socialist, Confederal of Unidos Podemos-En Comú Podem-En Marea and Mixed Parliamentary Groups.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 38 of sitting 75· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Ciudadanos, Gcup-ec-em and GER. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso. 3 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 28 most voted in favour; in 12, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 28
  • Against: 12
  • Tie: 12
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista84
84 in favour
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 in favour
Mixto19
14 in favour · 3 against · 2 did not vote
Ciudadanos32
32 in favour
Gcup-ec-em67
64 in favour · 3 did not vote
GER9
9 in favour
Popular en el Congreso134
132 against · 2 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.

Read the full method · Report an error