Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Creation of the Inquiry Committee regarding the alleged illegal financing of the People's Party.

Admitted step 2 of 7

Type of initiative: comision de investigacion art 52. It was introduced on 30 March 2017. Introduced by: Pleno del Congreso.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 152/000003· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 1 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted.

  1. Introduced30 March 2017Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted30 March 2017The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 2 official steps on a timeline
Mar 201711. 30 March 2017: Presentación22. 30 March 2017: Calificación

13 December 2017

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 198 yes · 132 no · 2 abst.

Voted on: Request for a six-month extension of the deadline for the completion of the work of the Inquiry Committee regarding the alleged illegal financing of the Popular Party.

This law had 2 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 13 of sitting 94· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, Mixto, Ciudadanos, Gcup-ec-em and GER. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso. 5 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 28 most voted in favour; in 12, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 28
  • Against: 12
  • Tie: 12
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista84
81 in favour · 3 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 did not vote
Mixto19
12 in favour · 3 against · 1 abst. · 3 did not vote
Ciudadanos32
32 in favour
Gcup-ec-em67
64 in favour · 1 abst. · 2 did not vote
GER9
9 in favour
Popular en el Congreso134
129 against · 5 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

Groups can now table amendments: proposed changes to the text.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.