What it is
Support for credit cooperatives and new bank debt rules
It is a royal decree-law. It was introduced on 26 June 2017. Introduced by: Gobierno.
Official title: Royal Decree-Law 11/2017, of June 23, on urgent measures in the financial field.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 130/000017· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- Credit cooperatives are now allowed to join institutional protection schemes, that is, groups of entities that support each other to keep any member from going into liquidation.
- Transactions between entities belonging to the same institutional protection scheme do not count toward the 50% limit on the total resources a cooperative can use for transactions with third parties.
- The private guarantee fund of an institutional protection scheme may hold a stake in a cooperative without the usual limits, but it must submit an action plan to the Bank of Spain for its future divestment.
- Entities belonging to an institutional protection scheme with its own fund may make smaller contributions to the Deposit Guarantee Fund.
- If a credit entity goes into insolvency proceedings, a new debt category is created: non-preferred ordinary credits, which are paid after other ordinary credits but before subordinated ones. They only qualify if they meet requirements such as a minimum term of one year and a clause stating their lower ranking.
- Debt instruments used to absorb losses in a resolution are no longer considered non-complex products, so investors get greater protection when buying them.
Who it affects
- Credit cooperatives: They can join institutional protection schemes and get more flexibility on certain transaction and capital limits.
- Credit entities and investment services firms: They must take into account the new non-preferred debt category and how their liabilities are treated in a resolution or insolvency.
- Investors who buy bank debt: Instruments that absorb losses are no longer non-complex products, giving investors more protection.
- Bank of Spain (Banco de España): It must approve the divestment plans of the private guarantee fund and develop, before September 30, 2017, the methods to calculate risk-based contributions to the Deposit Guarantee Fund.
Words worth knowing
- Sistema institucional de protección (institutional protection scheme)
- A group of credit entities that commit to supporting each other if one of them runs into trouble.
- Fondo de Garantía de Depósitos (Deposit Guarantee Fund)
- A public fund that returns money to customers if their bank or cooperative fails.
- Créditos ordinarios no preferentes (non-preferred ordinary credits)
- Debt that, if the entity fails, is paid after other ordinary credits and before subordinated debt.
- Concurso (insolvency proceedings)
- A court procedure opened when an entity cannot pay its debts and what is left must be divided among creditors.
- MREL
- The minimum amount of liabilities an entity must hold to absorb losses if its resolution begins, avoiding the use of public money.
It summarizes the law as published in the BOE. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.
- Introduced26 June 2017Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted10 July 2017The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
- Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenary10 July 2017All 350 deputies vote.
- Senateno dateThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEno dateIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 5 official steps on a timeline
11 July 2017
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Processing as a Government bill by the urgent procedure of Royal Decree-Law 11/2017, of June 23, on urgent measures in financial matters.
This law had 2 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 7 of sitting 65· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 2 yes · 6 no
- Albacete More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 3 yes · 9 no
- Almería More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Araba/Álava More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Asturias More votes against 2 yes · 5 no
- Ávila More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Badajoz More votes against 1 yes · 5 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 18 yes · 13 no
- Bizkaia Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Burgos More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Cáceres More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Cádiz More votes against 2 yes · 7 no
- Cantabria More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Córdoba More votes against 1 yes · 5 no
- Cuenca More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Gipuzkoa Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Girona More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Granada More votes against 1 yes · 6 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Huelva More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 2 yes · 6 no
- Jaén More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- La Rioja More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 2 yes · 6 no
- León More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Lugo More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Madrid More votes against 8 yes · 28 no
- Málaga More votes against 3 yes · 8 no
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 1 yes · 9 no
- Navarra More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ourense More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Palencia More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 2 yes · 5 no
- Salamanca More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 1 yes · 6 no
- Segovia More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Sevilla More votes against 3 yes · 9 no
- Soria More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Tarragona Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Teruel More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Toledo More votes against 1 yes · 5 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 5 yes · 11 no
- Valladolid More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Zamora More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 1 yes · 6 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Mixto, Gcup-ec-em and GER. Against, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Ciudadanos and Popular en el Congreso. 6 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 3 most voted in favour; in 46, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 3
- Against: 46
- Tie: 3
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 84 | 83 against · 1 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 against |
| Mixto | 19 | 14 in favour · 5 against |
| Ciudadanos | 32 | 32 against |
| Gcup-ec-em | 67 | 67 in favour |
| GER | 9 | 9 in favour |
| Popular en el Congreso | 134 | 1 in favour · 133 against |
What happens next
What happens now?
It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.
Published in the BOE: Royal Decree-Law 11/2017, of June 23, on urgent measures in the financial field.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 130/000017
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 7 of sitting 65
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- BOE, BOE-A-2017-7230
The law as published.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.