Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Proposal to amend Organic Law 4/1982, of June 9, on the Statute of Autonomy of the Region of Murcia.

Plenary step 5 of 7 · Unfinished

It is a reform of a regional statute. Changes a region’s statute of autonomy. It was introduced on 10 May 2017. Introduced by: Comunidad Autónoma de la Región de Murcia - Asamblea Regional.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 127/000003· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 5 of 7 steps. It reached Plenary, and today it is unfinished.

  1. Introduced10 May 2017Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted16 May 2017The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments22 September 2017Groups propose changes.
  4. Committee7 February 2018A committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary19 May 2017All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 9 official steps on a timeline
Jun 2017Sept 2017Dec 2017Mar 2018Jun 2018Sept 2018Dec 201811. 10 May 2017: Presentación22. 16 May 2017: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 16/05/2017 hasta 19/05/201733. 16 May 2017: Calificación44. 19 May 2017: Pleno Debate de totalidad desde 19/05/2017 hasta 12/09/201755. 12 September 2017: Mesa del Congreso Acuerdo subsiguiente a votación favorable en debate totalidad desde 12/09/2017 hasta 19/09/201766. 19 September 2017: Comisión Constitucional Publicación desde 19/09/2017 hasta 22/09/201777. 22 September 2017: Comisión Constitucional Enmiendas desde 22/09/2017 hasta 07/02/201888. 7 February 2018: Comisión Constitucional Informe desde 07/02/2018 hasta 05/03/201999. 5 March 2019: Concluido - (Trasladado al próximo Congreso) desde 05/03/2019 hasta 27/03/2019

12 September 2017

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 189 yes · 1 no · 149 abst.

Voted on: Proposal from the Murcia Regional Assembly, for the reform of Organic Law 4/1982, of June 9, on the Statute of Autonomy of the Region of Murcia.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 68· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, Ciudadanos and Gcup-ec-em. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.

By province: in 25 most voted in favour; in 0, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 25
  • Against: 0
  • Abstained: 13
  • Tie: 14
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista84
84 in favour
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 abst.
Mixto19
8 in favour · 8 abst. · 3 did not vote
Ciudadanos32
31 in favour · 1 did not vote
Gcup-ec-em67
66 in favour · 1 did not vote
GER9
9 abst.
Popular en el Congreso134
1 against · 127 abst. · 6 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.

It was presented again:

Presented before in:

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.