Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill would transfer the AP-9 highway to Galicia

Plenary step 5 of 7 · Unfinished

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 19 July 2016. Introduced by: Comunidad Autónoma de Galicia - Parlamento.

Official title: Private member's organic bill for the transfer of ownership and competences of the AP-9 to the Autonomous Community of Galicia (corresponds to file number 125/000004/0000 of the XI Legislature).

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 125/000004· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would transfer to the Autonomous Community of Galicia the ownership of the AP-9, the powers over the legal regime of its concession, and the functions and services the State has handled so far. Galicia would authorize new sections, supervise the highway, sanction the concessionaire, and decide on tolls and discounts.
  2. The transfer of services would only take effect when Galicia receives the necessary material and budgetary resources, through an agreement by the Joint Transfer Commission between the State and the Xunta de Galicia and a royal decree.
  3. The effective transfer would have to happen within six months of the law taking effect, and afterwards the Government would remove the AP-9 from the State road network.
  4. If Galicia decided to buy out the concession and return the highway to public hands, the State would assume the economic and financial obligations. The transfer would not affect border control, which remains with the State.

Words worth knowing

Concesión (concession)
A contract under which a private company runs and charges for a highway for a set period.
Rescate de la concesión (buyout of the concession)
When the government pays to end the contract and take the highway back into public hands.
Comisión Mixta de Transferencias (Joint Transfer Commission)
A body with representatives of the State and Galicia that finalizes transfer agreements.
Ley Orgánica (organic law)
A type of Spanish law that requires special majorities and is used, among other cases, to transfer powers to the autonomous communities.
Trámite (pending procedure)
This proposal is not an approved law: it is a text filed in the Congress that still must be debated and voted on.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 5 of 7 steps. It reached Plenary, and today it is unfinished.

  1. Introduced19 July 2016Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted6 September 2016The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments21 December 2018Groups propose changes.
  4. Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary28 February 2019All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 10 official steps on a timeline
Dec 2016Dec 2017Dec 201811. 19 July 2016: Presentación22. 6 September 2016: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 06/09/2016 hasta 09/09/201633. 6 September 2016: Calificación44. 9 September 2016: Gobierno Contestación desde 09/09/2016 hasta 13/12/2016 Nota: (Mesa 13/12/2016 - concluida - decaída por comunicación disconformidad Gobierno).55. 4 September 2018: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 04/09/2018 hasta 11/12/2018 Nota: (Nuevo criterio del Gobierno 19/07/2018).66. 11 December 2018: Mesa del Congreso Acuerdo subsiguiente a la toma en consideración desde 11/12/2018 hasta 18/12/201877. 18 December 2018: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 18/12/2018 hasta 21/12/201888. 21 December 2018: Enmiendas desde 21/12/2018 hasta 26/02/201999. 28 February 2019: Pleno Aprobación desde 28/02/2019 hasta 05/03/20191010. 5 March 2019: Concluido - (Caducado) desde 05/03/2019 hasta 27/03/2019

28 February 2019

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 309 yes · 32 no

Voted on: Agreement on direct processing and single reading of the Private Member's Organic Bill on the transfer of ownership and competences of the AP-9 to the Autonomous Community of Galicia.

This law had 2 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 6 of sitting 176· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Gcup-ec-em, GER and Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Ciudadanos.

By province: in 52 most voted in favour; in 0, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 52
  • Against: 0
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista84
83 in favour · 1 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 in favour
Mixto19
16 in favour · 3 did not vote
Ciudadanos32
32 against
Gcup-ec-em67
66 in favour · 1 did not vote
GER9
9 in favour
Popular en el Congreso134
130 in favour · 4 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.

It has not been presented again yet.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.