Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill to refund floor clause charges without going to court

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Rejected

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 8 November 2018. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario de Esquerra Republicana.

Official title: Private member's bill on urgent measures for consumer protection regarding floor clauses.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000304· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would create out-of-court ways for consumers to get back amounts overcharged through floor clauses in mortgage loans or credits, without having to go to court.
  2. The consumer would first have to file a claim with the bank itself. The bank would have three months to reach an agreement and pay back; if it rejects the claim or does not answer in time, the claim is deemed accepted and becomes enforceable.
  3. If the bank does not accept, it would have to turn to a conciliation before a Property Registrar or to consumer arbitration, and it would bear the full cost of either procedure.
  4. The Registrar could calculate the overcharged amounts and record them: the abusive clauses would be removed and the mortgage debt reduced, or the money refunded if the mortgage is already paid off.
  5. Banks would have one month to adapt and would have to set up a specialized department to handle these claims, with information available at all branches and on their websites.
  6. The bill would repeal royal decree-law A rule with the force of law that the Government passes because it is urgent. It applies from its publication, but the Congreso must validate it within 30 days or it lapses. 1/2017, the previous floor clause law, although the change it made to personal income tax The personal income tax (IRPF in Spain): what people pay on what they earn from work, business or savings. (IRPF) would remain.

Who it affects

  • Consumers with floor clauses in their mortgage: They could claim against the bank and recover overcharged amounts without going to court.
  • Banks and credit institutions: They would have to set up claim systems, pay conciliation or arbitration costs, and refund improper charges.
  • Property Registrars: They would take on new duties: conciliation, calculating overcharges, and recording the mortgage modification.
  • Consumer arbitration boards: They would step in when the bank rejects the consumer's claim.

Words worth knowing

Cláusula suelo (floor clause)
A mortgage term that sets a minimum interest rate on a variable-rate loan: even if the reference rate falls, you never pay below that minimum.
Cláusula abusiva (abusive clause)
A contract term that unfairly harms the consumer and that courts can declare void.
Novación hipotecaria (mortgage novation)
A change to the terms of an existing mortgage, recorded in the Property Registry.
Conciliación registral (registry conciliation)
A meeting before a Property Registrar so the parties can try to reach an agreement without going to court.
Arbitraje de consumo (consumer arbitration)
A system to resolve disputes between a consumer and a company through an award from an arbitration board, without going to court.
royal decree-law
A rule with the force of law that the Government passes because it is urgent. It applies from its publication, but the Congreso must validate it within 30 days or it lapses.
decree-law
A rule with the force of law that the Government passes because it is urgent. It applies from its publication, but the Congreso must validate it within 30 days or it lapses.
income tax
The personal income tax (IRPF in Spain): what people pay on what they earn from work, business or savings.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced8 November 2018Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted13 November 2018The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
Nov 2018Nov 2018Nov 2018Dec 2018Dec 2018Dec 201811. 8 November 2018: Presentación22. 13 November 2018: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 13/11/2018 hasta 16/11/201833. 13 November 2018: Calificación44. 16 November 2018: Gobierno Contestación desde 16/11/2018 hasta 11/12/201855. 11 December 2018: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 11/12/2018 hasta 18/12/201866. 18 December 2018: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 18/12/2018 hasta 26/12/2018

18 December 2018

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 91 yes · 160 no · 91 abst.

Voted on: Private Member's Bill by the Parliamentary Group of Esquerra Republicana, on urgent measures to protect consumers regarding floor clauses.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 165· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Mixto, Gcup-ec-em and GER. Against, most of Ciudadanos and Popular en el Congreso. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 6 most voted in favour; in 37, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 6
  • Against: 37
  • Abstained: 1
  • Tie: 8
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista84
84 abst.
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 abst.
Mixto19
16 in favour · 2 abst. · 1 did not vote
Ciudadanos32
30 against · 2 did not vote
Gcup-ec-em67
67 in favour
GER9
8 in favour · 1 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso134
130 against · 4 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.