What it is
Bill to refund floor clause charges without going to court
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 8 November 2018. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario de Esquerra Republicana.
Official title: Private member's bill on urgent measures for consumer protection regarding floor clauses.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000304· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would create out-of-court ways for consumers to get back amounts overcharged through floor clauses in mortgage loans or credits, without having to go to court.
- The consumer would first have to file a claim with the bank itself. The bank would have three months to reach an agreement and pay back; if it rejects the claim or does not answer in time, the claim is deemed accepted and becomes enforceable.
- If the bank does not accept, it would have to turn to a conciliation before a Property Registrar or to consumer arbitration, and it would bear the full cost of either procedure.
- The Registrar could calculate the overcharged amounts and record them: the abusive clauses would be removed and the mortgage debt reduced, or the money refunded if the mortgage is already paid off.
- Banks would have one month to adapt and would have to set up a specialized department to handle these claims, with information available at all branches and on their websites.
- The bill would repeal royal decree-law A rule with the force of law that the Government passes because it is urgent. It applies from its publication, but the Congreso must validate it within 30 days or it lapses. 1/2017, the previous floor clause law, although the change it made to personal income tax The personal income tax (IRPF in Spain): what people pay on what they earn from work, business or savings. (IRPF) would remain.
Who it affects
- Consumers with floor clauses in their mortgage: They could claim against the bank and recover overcharged amounts without going to court.
- Banks and credit institutions: They would have to set up claim systems, pay conciliation or arbitration costs, and refund improper charges.
- Property Registrars: They would take on new duties: conciliation, calculating overcharges, and recording the mortgage modification.
- Consumer arbitration boards: They would step in when the bank rejects the consumer's claim.
Words worth knowing
- Cláusula suelo (floor clause)
- A mortgage term that sets a minimum interest rate on a variable-rate loan: even if the reference rate falls, you never pay below that minimum.
- Cláusula abusiva (abusive clause)
- A contract term that unfairly harms the consumer and that courts can declare void.
- Novación hipotecaria (mortgage novation)
- A change to the terms of an existing mortgage, recorded in the Property Registry.
- Conciliación registral (registry conciliation)
- A meeting before a Property Registrar so the parties can try to reach an agreement without going to court.
- Arbitraje de consumo (consumer arbitration)
- A system to resolve disputes between a consumer and a company through an award from an arbitration board, without going to court.
- royal decree-law
- A rule with the force of law that the Government passes because it is urgent. It applies from its publication, but the Congreso must validate it within 30 days or it lapses.
- decree-law
- A rule with the force of law that the Government passes because it is urgent. It applies from its publication, but the Congreso must validate it within 30 days or it lapses.
- income tax
- The personal income tax (IRPF in Spain): what people pay on what they earn from work, business or savings.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced8 November 2018Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted13 November 2018The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
18 December 2018
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private Member's Bill by the Parliamentary Group of Esquerra Republicana, on urgent measures to protect consumers regarding floor clauses.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 165· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 2 yes · 4 no · 2 abst.
- Albacete More votes against 1 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 3 yes · 7 no · 2 abst.
- Almería More votes against 0 yes · 4 no · 2 abst.
- Araba/Álava Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Asturias Tie 3 yes · 3 no · 2 abst.
- Ávila More votes against 0 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Badajoz More votes against 1 yes · 3 no · 2 abst.
- Barcelona More votes in favour 16 yes · 7 no · 5 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no · 3 abst.
- Burgos More votes against 1 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Cáceres More votes against 0 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- Cádiz More votes against 2 yes · 4 no · 3 abst.
- Cantabria More votes against 1 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 1 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 0 yes · 3 no · 2 abst.
- Córdoba More votes against 1 yes · 3 no · 2 abst.
- Cuenca More votes against 0 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Girona More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Granada More votes against 1 yes · 4 no · 2 abst.
- Guadalajara More votes against 0 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Huelva More votes against 1 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- Huesca Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Illes Balears More votes against 2 yes · 4 no · 2 abst.
- Jaén More votes against 1 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- La Rioja More votes against 1 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Las Palmas More votes against 2 yes · 4 no · 2 abst.
- León More votes against 1 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Lleida More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Lugo More votes against 1 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Madrid More votes against 8 yes · 20 no · 7 abst.
- Málaga More votes against 2 yes · 6 no · 3 abst.
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 1 yes · 5 no · 2 abst.
- Navarra More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Ourense More votes against 0 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Palencia More votes against 0 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Pontevedra More votes against 2 yes · 3 no · 2 abst.
- Salamanca More votes against 0 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 1 yes · 4 no · 2 abst.
- Segovia More votes against 0 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Sevilla More votes against 3 yes · 4 no · 4 abst.
- Soria More votes against 0 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Tarragona More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Teruel More votes against 0 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Toledo More votes against 1 yes · 3 no · 2 abst.
- Valencia/València More votes against 5 yes · 8 no · 3 abst.
- Valladolid More votes against 1 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Zamora More votes against 0 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Zaragoza More votes against 1 yes · 4 no · 2 abst.
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Mixto, Gcup-ec-em and GER. Against, most of Ciudadanos and Popular en el Congreso. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 6 most voted in favour; in 37, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 6
- Against: 37
- Abstained: 1
- Tie: 8
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 84 | 84 abst. |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 abst. |
| Mixto | 19 | 16 in favour · 2 abst. · 1 did not vote |
| Ciudadanos | 32 | 30 against · 2 did not vote |
| Gcup-ec-em | 67 | 67 in favour |
| GER | 9 | 8 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Popular en el Congreso | 134 | 130 against · 4 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000304
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 165
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.